Epstein Secrets

IBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUI

ndants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undis

and punish Epstein for his crimes against them in whatever avenue remained open to them. On August 12, 2008, at the request of his client Jane Doe, Brad Edwards filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of Jane Doe. See Edwards Affidavit, "N" at ¶7. Included in thi

ffidavit") (Exhibit "N"). 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent E.W.; on July 2, 2008, attorn

the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). EFTA00081182 Case 9:08.cv_807agg3498mot 2rKali564rgerNeocp0F4lapiyocisstggy aig15 Page 4 of orrasions between 2002 and 2005 in his mansi

ffidavit") (Exhibit "N"). 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent..; on July 2, 2008, attorney

1/2015 Page 2 of 9 P ORAS Tam C leis Action Pe winal Injury Wconglul Otell Comer cal Lotqatton WWW.PATHTOJUSTICE COM Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. August 20, 2014 Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida RE: Jane Does I and 21 United St

ns. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. (850) 224-7000 141004142-7011 WWW.S ARCYLAW CO

our letters and Is considering the matter, as well as your request for a meeting. I will try to get an answer for you as soon as possible. • From: Brad Edwards - Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:12 PM To: Redacted (OWLS); Redacted (USAFLS) Cc: Paul Cassell Subject: Doe 'US When we spoke a few months a

e the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser.. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). EFTA00188866 Case 9:08-cv-807Ni Vam aKW 2WpeeerNar rai Rmiyocisstg21420n915 Page 4 of occasions between 2002 and 2005 in his mansion in

ndants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undis

this subject at his deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent rather than make an incriminating admission. Accordingly, Edwards is entitled to the adverse inference against Epstein that, had Epstein answered, the answer would have been unfavorable to him. "[I]t is well-settle

ffidavit") (Exhibit "N"). 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent..; on July 2, 2008, attorney

the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). EFTA00725999 occasions between 2002 and 2005 in his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida. These sexual assaults included vaginal penetrati

Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were calculated

spiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with

mandating that registration cannot be used as a form of punishment. Kansas' Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 362 (1997); Johnson' State, 795 So.2d 82, 87 (Fla. App. 5th Dist. 2000) ("Analogous to the cited Federal cases, the legislative intent of the Florida Sexual Offender notification and registration require