Epstein Secrets

y Edwards, et al. (Case NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG); and upon reading the Affirmation of Robert Y. Lewis dated September 15, 2010, the Affidavits of Bradley James Edwards and Michael Fisten both dated September 14, 2010, the Memorandum of Law dated September 16, 2010, and all the exhibits attached thereto, and it appe

APPLICATION FOR CPLR 3102(E) ORDER Index No. TO PRODUCE TAPE RECORDING x NOTICE OF MOTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed Affidavit of Bradley James Edwards dated September 14, 2010, the Affidavit of Michael Fisten dated September 14, 2010, the Affirmation of Robert Y. Lewis dated September 15, 2010, the

tein (Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMBAB)(Florida Circuit Court, 15h Judicial Circuit). 3. In December 2009, Epstein brought a vendetta lawsuit against Edwards and others alleging abuse of process in connection with those civil actions. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards, et al. (Case No: 502009CA040800XXX

n and me, which at bottom concerns his sexual abuse of girls while they were minors, the very topic of the recorded conversation. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards, et al. (Case NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG)(Florida Circuit Court, 15th Judicial Circuit). I. The Sexual Molestation Actions Against Epstein and His

IAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 502009CA040800X)MMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually. BRALacpY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. 17:3; t —CA c->"5-7, cn. % t 0 Cn -2 ° ! C' (n • • rn ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO A

t 0 Cn -2 ° ! C' (n • • rn ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER r - THIS CAUSE, having come on before the Court upon Defendant Bradley J. Edwards's Motion to Appoint Commissioner, and the Court having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is, ORDERED an

that Epstein had apparently written about the case. 13. I have been extensively involved in the investigation attempting to support Jane Doe's and Brad Edwards's claims against Epstein. As part of my duties in investigating the cases, I have attempted to locate all recorded statements made by 3 EFTA0072847

ecorded call. 7. Rush had previously spoken to attorney Edwards (the attorney representing Jane Doe) and me conc

Mr. Rush's interview of Mr. Epstein. (Fisten Aff., Apr. 23, 2010 [Real Party in Interest Jane Doe's Resp. in Opp'n to Mot. of Daily News, L.P., to Quash Subpoena, Ex. B] 1 3.) Mr. Rush paraphrased the interview relatively thoroughly. (Id. 1 7.) 4. As noted above, the present motion has been argued on the

E. The Present Motion to Compel I0 ARGUMENT 11 I. EDWARDS MAY NOT RELY ON THE VACATED DISTRICT COURT ORDER FROM THE JANE DOE ACTION 12 II. EDWARDS FAILS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCOVERY OF A NON-PARTY UNDER CPLR 3101(a) 14 A. The Epstein Interview Does Not Have Heightened Relevance to

a deposition in one of the now-settled suits by implying that "he did not recognize" reporter Rush. Moving Br. at 17; see also Moving Affidavit of Bradley James Edwards, sworn to Sept. 14, 2010 ("Edwards Aft"), ¶ 22. Besides being farfetched and factually unsupported, Edwards' apparent desire to attack Epstein's cr

pstein sex abuse litigation, as even a quick Google search reveals. See. e.g., Heiress Quizzed in Sex Suits. M. POST, Oct. 12, 2009 ("Florida lawyer Brad Edwards. who represents three of the 'Jane Does' who are suing Epstein, told Page Six that Phislaine] Maxwell would be questioned over her knowledge of how

lawyers and others close to the case — including attorney Edwards — who could provide tips and information to assi

sclosing brief portions of the Epstein interview to third parties (Balin Aff. Ex. K (Jane Doe's Response in Opposition to Motion of Daily News, to Quash Subpoena), at 6-13) — the same exact waiver argument he makes here. The federal District Court (McKenna, J.) did not accept Edwards' waiver argument; but, i

rt S Mermelstein LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami , FL 33160 USA Fax: !Bradley James Friwards LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale , FL 33301 U

sol Plaintiff Jane Doe Consol Plaintiff C.M.A. Consol Plaintiff Adam D. Horowitz LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Farmer. Jaffe. Weissina, Edwards, Fistos. Lehrman. P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale , FL 33301 A Fax: Jeffrey Marc Herman LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTI

uart) (Entered: 05/05/2010) 538 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth A. Marra: Status Conference held on 5/6/2010. Adam Horowitz, Bradley Edwards, Katherine Ezell f r PI in iff nd Michael Pike, Robert Critton for Defendant. Court Reporter: Stephen Franklin, [email protected]

rt in case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM; granting (65) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re (66 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support in case 9:08-

Defendant Class Code: CLOSED Closed: Yes Statute: 28:1331 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Demand Amount: $0 NOS Description: Personal Injury Attorneys Bradley James Edwards [COR LD NTC] Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos 8. Lehrman PL 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale , FL 33301 USA 954-524-2820 Fax:

m P. Dimitrouleas on 9/21/2010. (lk) (Entered: 09/21/2010) STRICKEN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by M. J. Proof of Service Summons on Defendant, Epstein (Edwards. Bradley) Modified on 11/3/2010 (Is). (Stricken per DE #10) (Entered: 10/29/2010) STRICKEN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by M. J. Proof of Service of Subp

d: 05/05/2010) 05/06/2010 538 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth A. Marra: Status Conference held on 5/6/2010. Adam Horowitz, Bradley Edwards. Katherine Ezell for Plaintiff and Michael Pike, Robert Critton for Defendant. Court Reporter: Stephen Franklin. 561-514-3768 / Stephen_Franklin@fls

. (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 04/06/2009) ENDORSED ORDER granting 71 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re 66 MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support . Responses d

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 17 of 18 Respectfully Submitted, Plaintiff, by One of Her Counsel, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone

Senator Kerry refers to the statutorily imposed damage amount as "penalties." Id. The cases of U.S. v. Siegel, supra (11th Cir. 1998), and U.S. v. Edwards, supra (3d Cir. 1998), also support Defendant's position that application of the current version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 would be in clear violation of

4/13/2009 32 ENDORSED ORDER granting (73) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re (66 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support in case 9:08