Epstein Secrets

30 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. NURIK One E. Broward Boulevard, Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. EDWARDS POTT1NGER LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301-3268 Attormeys for Bradley J. Edwards EFTA00808548

on and the procurement of minors to engage in prostitution and further agreed to be registered as a sex offender (App.13, p.133). Bradley Edwards ("Edwards") is a civil attorney who represented multiple victims of Epstein's serial abuse of children. Edwards filed three civil actions against Epstein in

derdale. FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. EDWARDS POTT1NGER LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, St

pstein, through counsel, moves to set-aside the default, which motion is never ruled upon (Res.App. 4, pp.34-36).3 April 13, 2011 Epstein files his First Amended Complaint (App.6) and never moves to default Rothstein. August 22, 2011 Epstein filed the Second Amended Complaint (App.8) which included a claim against E

lief from the judge presiding over the Giuffre Matter. On July 24, 2017, and pursuant to the Court's admonition in the July 17 Order, we spoke with Brad Edwards, who is counsel for Jane Doe in both the Giuffre Matter and the Jane Doe Matter. We informed Mr. Edwards that the defendants would like to make an a

n in the July 17 Order, we spoke with Brad Edwards, who is counsel for Jane Doe in both the Giuffre Matter and the Jane Doe Matter. We informed Mr. Edwards that the defendants would like to make an application to the judge presiding over the Giuffre Matter for relief from the Protective Order as it appl

king relief from a protective order issued in the Gee v. Maxwell matter ("Protective Order" and "Giuffre Matte?) and ii) to dismiss the plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-captioned matter ("Jane Doe Matter"), and b) your request for an opportunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matte

n, 08-CV-80893-ICAM: This suit was filed by one of the victims who brought the victim's rights suit against the United States. She is represented by Brad Edwards. The Complaint raises the following claims: sexual exploitation, sexual abuse and/or sexual assault of a minor (Count I), "Cause of Action pursuant

st the United States. She is represented by Brad Edwards. The Complaint raises the following claims: sexua

o allow suit by any person who, "while a minor," was a victim of a violation. PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 9 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT EFTA00189795 First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement (which is attached hereto): A. The applicable version of § 2255 only permits "minor" to sue:

for relief from the judge presiding over the Matter. On July 24, 2017, and pursuant to the Court's admonition in the July 17 Order, we spoke with Brad Edwards, who is counsel for Jane Doe in both the Matter and the Jane Doe Matter. We informed Mr. Edwards that the defendants would like to make an applicat

monition in the July 17 Order, we spoke with Brad Edwards, who is counsel for Jane Doe in both the Matter and the Jane Doe Matter. We informed Mr. Edwards that the defendants would like to make an application to the judge presiding over the Matter for relief from the Protective Order as it applies to

s i) seeking relief from a protective order issued in the v. Maxwell matter ("Protective Order" and "M Matte?) and ii) to dismiss the plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-captioned matter ("Jane Doe Matter"), and b) your request for an opportunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matte