Epstein Secrets

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

spiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with

Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were calculated

of RRA. 5. Defendant, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant he

STEIN, (hereinafter 'EPST.EIN"), by and through. tie Utideraigned attorneys, files this. action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, IndiVidually, BRADLEY-J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., individually. ACC0rdingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyerS and emplOyee

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00193785 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 14 transportation on flights of RRA clients on any of EPSTEIN'S planes. But EDWARDS asked many inflamm

AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. cor.50.2929aufactigIVP111, CASE NO. • A Aq SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and .M., individually, Defendants. COMPL CO Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned

ant, ROTHSTEIN and Stuall osenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

at ROTHSTEIN was utilizing RRA as a front for the mass selling an alleged interest or investment in the Ci • Epstein. 27. Further evidencing that EDWARDA possibly other attorneys of RRA) knew or should have known and participated in the continuation of the massive Ponzi scheme, a front-page Palm Beac

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00795599 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

spiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with

Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were calculated

FLORIDA &WHEYSett* Plaintiff; v. Complex Litigation, Fla: k cht Pro. 1201 CASE NO. pn 50 2009CAO' -1Oe)"4B SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indliricluallYt BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L;,M;,. Individually, Defendants. COPY RECEIVED FOR FPLING DEC Ti itgag orfArt6N M. POCK COMPLAINT 0Ingfil% ciPMPTROIVIR

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00223279 Epstein RRA, at al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. I Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., Individually, Defendants. 50 2009 UV 0 3 MCCUE COMPLAINT COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING DEC Q t 2QP enAriory n. POCK CLAR

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

eme. e) After EDWARDS was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attomey EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory a

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00190037 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. 50 2009 CA 0 h 03 \MCCOMB COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING oic 0 1Mg EMIVION It PUCK COMPLAINT Gl

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00596500 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. 50 2009 CA 0 b 0 3 MOUE 4) COPY RECEIVED FOR HUNG DEC u ( 2008 sriesnoN Ii poCK COMPLAINT p

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00729415 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

EY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: Defendants. COMPLAINT SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other l

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and Is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00286294 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, STUART ROSENFELDT, individually, WILLIAM BERGER, individually, RUSSELL ADLER, individually, DEBBIE VILLEGAS, individually, DAVID

sociate, partner, shareholder, and/or other representative of RRA. EFTA00725320 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 3 8. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

furthering the Ponzi scheme. 42. Any such actions by ROTHSTEIN, BODEN, BARNETT and VILLEGAS and the Litigation Team would be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflict of issues rules. 43. As a result of the fraudulent investment or

n, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, STUART ROSENFELDT, individually, RUSSELL ADLER, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, WILLIAM BERGER, individually, KENNETH JENNE, individually, MICHAEL FISTEN, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. COM

involving alleged Epstein settlements (current and future) and other alleged matters. 4. ROTHSTEIN and others in RRA, including, BERGER, ADLER and EDWARDS, abused the legal process, by not simply aggressively litigating existing cases, but conducting discovery and making media presentations that far e

pose of furthering the Ponzi scheme. 52. Any such actions by ROTHSTEIN, others and the Litigation Team would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules. 53. As a result of the fraudulent investment or

ue No. 08-08804 Richard Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A.. 2290 10'h Ave North, Suite 404 Lake W Phone: Fax: in elated Case No. 08-80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202 Hollyw L 33020 Pho : Fax: Counsel for Paint' in elated Case

Phone: Fax: in elated Case No. 08-80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, L

at Mr. Epstein, including his agents, would have' no direct or indirect contact with the victims named on this list. In addiditon, under applicable Florida Bar Rules governing contact by attorneys and their agents with persons represented by counsel, any contact with any of our clients or their fray members by Mr