Epstein Secrets

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF HIS SUPPLEMEN

ubmits the attached Opinion in the case of Jane Doe No. 1 v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014), attached to this Notice as Exhibit A, and Edwards' clients' Appellee Brief filed in that case, attached to this Notice as Exhibit B. In Jane Doe No. 1, the United States Court of Appeals for the El

F HIS SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS, ETC. As supplemental authority in support of his Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non- Privileged Nature of Documents and with Specific Request for In Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability

EFTA00592503 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 185 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2013 Page 7 of 8 DATED: June 12, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, M. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tele

SD Docket 06/12/2013 Page 7 of 8 DATED: June 12, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, M. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimile Florida B E-mail: and Paul G. Cass

arguments that the victims had not seen before in the three-and-a-half years that this case has been litigated. The victims then filed under seal a Motion for Court to Deny the Motion to Dismiss Based on Existing Pleadings or, at a Minimum, Allow Leave to File a Sur-Reply. That motion explained that the Governm

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON COURT'S TRIAL DOCKET (Adds Item No. 22) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this ca

Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1051] 11/17/17 Edwards' Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1077] 3 12/4/17 Edwards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II - V only; Se

s Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing Names with Initials of Edwards' Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] 15 3/5/18 Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Ma

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO MAKE COURT RECORDS CONFIDENTIAL Plaintiff/Co

ourt records confidential, and in support thereof, states: 1. There is a dispute between Epstein and DefendanUCounter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards ("Edwards") over the privileged nature of certain documents that were included on a disc recently obtained from Epstein's former counsel, Fowler White. 2. E

ndix in Support of Response in Opposition to Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and D.E. 1252, Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for 2 EFTA00793756 Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and

BACH9 PA April 10, 2018 Via Email jeevacationegmaitcom Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, 83 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards File No.: 2.0001 Dear Jeffrey: 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 TEL (561) 727-3600 I FAX (561) 727-3601 Attache

Addressing the Admissibility of Edwards' Exhibit 132; (12) Epstein's Motion in Limine re Sex Offender Registry; (13) Epstein's Motion in Limine on Edwards' Newly Disclosed Exhibits; (14) Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice; and (15) Objections to Deposition Designations; assemble hearing notebooks

from Trial Docket in Order to Comply With the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440; work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials; work on Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special M

& APPELLATE LAW LINK& ROCKENBACH, PA August 14, 2018 Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards File No.: 2.0001 Dear Jeffrey: 1555 Palm Beach Lakes, Blvd., Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 TEL: (561) 847-4408 I FAX: (561) 855.2891 Atta

s to what the evidence will show into two subsections: (a) that J. Epstein did not violate the November 30, 2010 Order; and (b) that Farmer Jaffe, Edwards, and Intervenors have sustained no actual, compensatory losses, encompassing 07/25/18 SJL Work on preparation for two-day hearing In front of Jud

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr

. Nurick was there and Scarola. Nurick and Scarola were powwowing after the hearing. It's an important ruling for us to be able to tell the jury in Edwards that we still have a pending case against Rothstein. I suggest we set Rothstein for deposition. His deposition was very ineffectively taken before.

Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 930 MIS Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, USV 00802 CLIENT: 0002 - Jeffrey Epstein Re: 0001 Bradley Edwards August 7,2018 Invoice #1034 Date Services Hours Amount 07/02/18 TLC Follow up with D. Indyke re status of drafting; working on hearing folde

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr