3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
8 / 3
Mentions
d JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I
ons and Government Answers 24 EFTA00208631 Case 9:00-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 0811612013 Page 25 of 64 EXHIBIT 1 To Brad Edwards Affidavit EFTA00208632 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 26 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTH
1 Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfully Submitted, S/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. EFTA00208645 Case 9:00-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 0811612013 Page 39 of 64 EXHIBIT 2 To Brad E
tification letter. The notification promises that the Justice Department would make its "best efforts" to protect Jane Doe No. 1's rights, including Ville reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case" and "to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the distric
d JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I
ons and Government Answers 24 EFTA00615892 Case 9:00-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2014 Page 25 of 64 EXHIBIT 1 To Brad Edwards Affidavit EFTA00615893 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 265-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2014 Page 26 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTH
ys to reduce any such burden. DATED: October 3, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, 5/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN EFTA00615905 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 265-1 Entered on FLED Docket 10/20/2014 Page 38 of 64 and Paul G. Cassell Pro H
tification letter. The notification promises that the Justice Department would make its "best efforts" to protect Jane Doe No. 1's rights, including Ville reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case" and "to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the distric
e Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA- I met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regardingJeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for= who had alleged that she is a victim
016, AUSA- I met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regardingJeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for= who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell.28 (Ex. 5 at 1).29 At
med in the proposed agreement, because the USAO was not interested in prosecuting those individuals if Epstein entered a plea. Villafana told OPR, [Ville considered Epstein to be the top of the food chain, and we wouldn't have been interested in prosecuting anyone else.' She did not consider the possi
Entities connected to both Bradley Edwards and Ville

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSONFISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION