Epstein Secrets

Florida, this day of , 2009. 1 e v izOOS David French !:)r- c\c"``A- Circuit Judge Copies furnished: TTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates, , JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, erbury Goldberger & Weiss, PA., EFTA00722688 IN THE COURT O

day of , 2009. 1 e v izOOS David French !:)r- c\c"``A- Circuit Judge Copies furnished: TTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates, , JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, erbury Goldberger & Weiss, PA., EFTA00722688 IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUD

is day of , 2009SAGOO et -, IREml VA r e `0 • David French' . Circuit Judge Copies furnished: TTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., D EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates. , JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, iterbuly Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. EFTA00722689 g e sz LEOPO

ral Rico Act is equally applicable to claims under the Florida Rico statute). 2. Moore v. Potter, 142 Fed. Appx. WL 1600194 (11Th Cir. 2005). 3. Pilkington v. United Airlines 112 F.3d 1532, 1536 (11th Cir,1997) 4. Stansfield v. Starkey, 269 Cal.Rptr., 337, 348 (Cal. App.3d, 1990) 5. Zimmerman v. HBO

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EDWARDS' WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND

, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EDWARDS' WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTIONS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), submits this Memorandum of Law as to the Do

leged material to a third party waives the privilege as such disclosure is inconsistent with the confidential relationship."); Visual Scene, Inc. v. Pilkington 4 EFTA00805370 Bros., 508 So. 2d 437, 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) ("In most cases, a voluntary disclosure to a third party of the privileged material

s O ) .1 •s--• tAtin Beach, it Our' c C•T David French Vr- Circuit Judge Copies furnished: TTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates, JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA.. and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger EFTA0061441

, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates, JAY HOWELL,

ral Rico Act is equally applicable to claims under the Florida Rico statute). 2. Moore v. Potter, 142 Fed. Appx. WL 1600194 (11Th Cir. 2005). 3. Pilkington v. United Airlines 112 F.3d 1532, 1536 (11th Cir,1997) 4. Stansfield v. Starkey, 269 Cal.Rptr., 337, 348 (Cal. App.3d, 1990) 5. Zimmerman v. HBO

s R day of 2009: EFTA00234869 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2009 Page 26 of 26 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 26 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Counsel for Plaintiff Paul G. Cassell, Esq.

Page 26 of 26 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 26 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las O

at the racketeering activity caused him to suffer an injary. . ., a claim stemming from personal injury is not cognizable under Rico." Id; see also Pilkington v. United Airlines. 112 F.3d 1532, 1536 (11th Cir. 1997); Federal Procedure, 5B Fed. Proc., L. Ed., §10:160, Sta a, Private Civil Actions Under ER