Epstein Secrets

never been examined. She speaks to the media — 2011 UK in particular — she then gives an "ex parte" taped interview to Scarola who is representing Edwards — she then files multiple affidavits in the CVRA all of which were stricken, none of which were able to be disputed at a hearing — and now an affida

nberg < > wrote: Will do. The timing is not right for me to call - she (or Dexter) have no due dates, no issues, they are just waiting for either J Marra to reso ve a I the open discovery issues (their 14,000 withheld pgs with 6E and privilege issues) or for Cassell to file (after all these years) his

thinking worst case scenario (what else do lawyers do) — in the event you were ever in a remedy hrg before j marra or in a punitive damage case with Edwards (you can better assess the odds of that occurring which I am assuming to be low but not non-existent), the quoted statements attributed to you re "m

d against you. I would expect that Edwards would do whatever he could to insert the article into the CVRA case even before the remedy phase to anger J Marra (and attempt thru subpoena to pursue discovery from the reporter eg his notes of interviews with you). The reporter wants to speak with you again, i

27607 Date: Friday, March 18, 2011, 5:11 PM Previously we discussed intervention in this case and decided not to. In light of Paul Casssell's and Brad Edward's efforts to use these materials we should reconsider. I have previously sent you my emails to and from Paul. Joe (Description: Description: rJosep

rch 18, 2011, 5:25 PM Lets see what is filed, what remedies they are seeking, whether they are seeking to unseal etc. My own intuitive view is that J Marra would only consider a remedy adverse to JE (as contrasted to the likely remedy against the USAO or a decl judgment that different 3771 standards mus