Epstein Secrets

er the CVRA at the same time as the Office was not disclosing the NPA's existence to Jane Doe 5 and the other victims.116 101. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted the line AUSA handling the case to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide

19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101. 124 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18-19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101; Declaration of Brad Edwards (Exhibit 102). 35 EFTA00804362 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 36 of 57 109. Had they known that the

g and a hearing on the issue of the remedy for the violations of their rights. DATED: February 10, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, AI sae, p. Samna Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimile E

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

er the CVRA at the same time as the Office was not disclosing the NPA's existence to Jane Doe 5 and the other victims.116 101. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted the line AUSA handling the case to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide

19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101. 124 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18-19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101; Declaration of Brad Edwards (Exhibit 102). 35 EFTA00591639 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 36 of 57 109. Had they known that the

g and a hearing on the issue of the remedy for the violations of their rights. DATED: February 10, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, AI sae, p. Samna Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimile E

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

ce while we conduct a thorough investigation." The referenced letter made no disclosure about the NPA. Id. at 33, 1 99. In mid-June 2008, attorney Brad Edwards contacted the line prosecutor handling the case to inform her that he represented Jane Doe I. On June 27, 2008, Brad Edwards further informed the l

rm her that he represented Jane Doe I. On June 27, 2008, Brad Edwards further informed the line prosecutor that that he also represented Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to meet with the prosecutor to provide information about Epstein, hoping to secure a significant federal indictment against Epstein, consiste

As an exhibit to their response to the Government's summary judgment motion, the victims have filed a detailed affidavit from the victims' attorney, Bradley J. Edwards, about the nature of the calls that he had with the line prosecutor. See Edwards Aff. of Aug. II, 2017, at IN 11.25. If the Government fails to disp

equires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (E. Fla. 2012). If the evidence offered by the nonmoving party is 17 EFTA00597334 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 41

er the CVRA at the same time as the Office was not disclosing the NPA's existence to Jane Doe 5 and the other victims.116 101. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted the line AUSA handling the case to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide

19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101. 124 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18-19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101; Declaration of Brad Edwards (Exhibit 102). 35 EFTA00184258 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 36 of 57 109. Had they known that the

a hearing on the issue of the remedy for the violations of their rights. DATED: February 10, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, Is/ Flaky 9. Sdeatela Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FIS1'OS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts " 3 See Exhibit 88. IM Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18