Epstein Secrets

ers were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, M, and E. Fl Your Affiant's letter to was hand-delivered by the FBI agents (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to was hand-delivered by

(Ex. 5). 4. Throughout the investigation, the FBI agents, the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, and your Affiant had contact with and M. Attorney Edwards' other client, M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenbe

alist, and your Affiant had contact with and M. Attorney Edwards' other client, M., was represented by counsel an

e the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not includ

: 2009. Do Circuit udge ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR.. ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive. Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, BRAD EDWARDS. ESQ., Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury, Gold

: Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael Burman, Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Jay Howell, Esq. Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Will

rive. Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, BRAD EDWARDS. ESQ., Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las

REY EPSTEIN, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SPECIAL SET HEARING THIS CAUSE having come before this Court upon Plaintiff, M.'s, Motion for Special Set Hearing, and the Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, it is hereby: ORDERED AND ADJUD

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINT

Epstein ("Epstein"), responds in opposition to the Motion for Protective Order [D.E. 1026] filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley Edwards ("Edwards"), relating to the deposition of M. 1 [D.E. 1027], and moves to compel her to answer questions relating to the Crimes Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA") a

side the NPA through the CVRA action: 10 And we intend to prove that Jeffrey 11 Epstein's motive in filing these knowingly 12 false claims against Brad Edwards - his 13 motive was to extort Bradley Edwards into 14 abandoning or cheaply compromising the 15 rights of his clients, and abandoning his 16 effo

9/17 Tr. 110:13-19.) Edwards has identified M. on his Witness List. [D.E. 1042, ¶ 15.] Edwards has also designated and cross designated portions of M.'s testimony to be used at the trial of this matter. [D.E. 1022; D.E. 1130.] Because M. is incarcerated, the parties can only rely on her deposition t

EY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: Defendants. COMPLAINT SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other l

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and Is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

g a book of "Psalms" that she obtained from a religious store (DT 152:1-14). Under the circumstances, her claim for damages against EPSTEIN, one of M.'s many "Johns" during that same period, would be so incredible and certainly not likely to produce the extraordinary settlements promised to "RRA's i

ers were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, . ., M, and E. Fl Your Affiant's letter to M was hand-delivered by the FBI agents (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to M. was hand-

(Ex. 5). 3. Throughout the investigation, the FBI agents, the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, and your Affiant had contact with and M. Attorney Edwards' other client, M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenbe

alist, and your Affiant had contact with and M. Attorney Edwards' other client, M., was represented by counsel an

e the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not includ

e621-3493-40cd-8666.0Do698ca2735 EFTA00750707 17 le 19 20 n 24 25 Page 4 1 APPEARANCES: 2 On Shelf deb* Plaintiff. Jane Doe 3 BRAD 1. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Dietary Case, Sete 1650 401 Es Las Cass Boalceard 5 Mont 33)01 On hLlfof Alley Esidn: ROBERT D. EAMON

lic in and for the State of Florida at Large, in the above cause. (Discussion held off the record.) MR. CRITTON: Let's get started. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, and I represent Jane Doe. ' MR. HILL: Jack Hill, on behalf (AM. MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, on behalf of Jane Does 2 through 8. MR. LANGINO: A

ed out °M.'s the 21 first time. 22 Q. All right So sometime in the latter part of 23 2006ar moved back ton's - I'm sorry -- you moved 24 from M.'s apartment in West Palm Beach, so the latter 25 part of 2006 to sometime In 2007, you were living back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1