Epstein Secrets

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ROUGH DRAFT TITLE ***ROUGH DRAFT TRANSCRIPT*** CASE NAME: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ WITNESS NAME: PAUL G. CASSELL DATE OF DEPOSITION: 10/16/15 This is an unedited, unproofread, uncerti

mmon interest privilege with you as counsel in the CVRA case? Had you entered into an agreement with any other attorney? You have co-counsel , Mr. Edwards. MS. McCAWLEY: Well , to the extent that's going to reveal privileged information about accountant interest agreement, I am not going to ROUGH DR

t know that it's directly responsive to your question, but also the Scarola law firm, Mr. Scarola in connection with litigation he was handling for Brad Edwards. Q. Any any other law firm lawyers that you had a common interest privilege with? A. No. Q. And you're going to refuse to answer questions ab

sex trafficking ring to do this, just -- just right out of the blue or call somebody up on the phone. This is difficult and tricky business. The Federal Government had been trying to do this for years, and Mr. Edwards and I had been trying to do it too, so ROUGH DRAFT ONLY EFTA00607269 52 1 2 3 4 5 6

have counsel state their appearances? MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. : Good morning, Your Honor. Sid for Jane Doe II. THE COURT: Good

sel state their appearances? MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. : Good morning, Your Honor. Sid for Jane Doe II. THE COURT: Good morning. MR.

ard Miami, FL 33160 305.931.2200 For Jane Doe BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. 17 Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Ola

criticize anyone who got in his way, including the elected State Attorney. This resulted in a federal investigation on a topic no one remembers the Federal Government ever being interested in prosecuting before. Although 1 am certain that you personally have not had your decision-making process compromised, the ap

M MO NM DB NYO NB HF HF HF AF BF HF Fe Fe HF |S ao FBP WN F- 970 DO DN ODO OT BR W NY — ROUGH DRAFT TITLE ***ROUGH DRAFT TRANSCRIPT *** CASE NAME: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ WITNESS NAME: PAUL G. CASSELL DATE OF DEPOSITION: 10/16/15 This is an unedited, unproofread, | uncertif

a common interest privilege with you as counsel in the CVRA case? Had you entered into an agreement with any other attorney? You have co-counsel, Mr. Edwards. MS. McCAWLEY: Well, to the extent that's going to reveal privileged information about accountant interest agreement, I am not going to ROUGH DRAF

question. BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Who, as your understanding as of December 30th of 2014, with which attorneys did you have a common interest privilege? A. Brad Edwards from, obviously, the law firm that I've been working with here. Also attorneys from the Boies Schiller law firm who were representing Virginia Robert

nal sex trafficking ring to do this, just -- just right out of the blue or call somebody up on the phone. This is difficult and tricky business. The Federal Government had been trying to do this for years, and Mr. Edwards and I had been trying to do it too, so ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021874 Oo O DN OO F

counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose the Motion to Intervene. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Bruce E. Reinhart BRUCE E. REINHART,

any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Ca.qgell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I d

tes" means the President, the Vice President, and any current Federal employee (including an individual appointed as an employee or detailed to the Federal Government under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3371-3376)) who is detailed to or employed by any: (i) Agency (including a Government corporati

the two Florida offenses. The judge left open what the possible remedy could be.E1391 v. Epstein (2015) In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims WI Where are they now? The Act lawsuit,rio] la), alleged in a sworn affidavit that a

n a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the C

-2009 during the exact period the targeted victim was di- rectly targeted by Epstein and Maxwell while located in Port Pine under the leader- ship of Federal Government member Rowan Ramsay Directly connected to the mother ynthia nothe. on her birthday via a mobil e)etr eCL DI Australian Federal Government - Kad

ffenses. The judge left open what the possible remedy could be.1.139) Virginia Giuffre v. Epstein (2015) In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims Where arC1 they Pc'YY2,111, Rights Act lawsuit,[Wl Virginia Giuffre (then known as !

n a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the C

plied. Hon Steven Marshall. Hon Vicki Chapman. Hon Stephen Wade .1 then proceeded to contact the following Government Sources : • Hon Rex Patrick, Federal Government • Hon Pauline Hanson, Senator of Queensland • Hon Adam Bandt, Senator of Victoria I submitted the same:exact report and documented evidence uplo

er counsel on the phone for permitting us to appear 19 by phone. 20 THE COURT: All right. Anyone else have anything they 21 want to add? 22 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards on behalf of Jane Doe. 23 I only had one issue here, and when I read your motion 24 that you wanted to hear on the narrow issue of j

l on the phone for permitting us to appear 19 by phone. 20 THE COURT: All right. Anyone else have anything they 21 want to add? 22 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards on behalf of Jane Doe. 23 I only had one issue here, and when I read your motion 24 that you wanted to hear on the narrow issue of just defense in

criticize anyone who got in his way, including the elected State Attorney. This resulted in a federal investigation on a topic no one remembers the Federal Government ever being interested in prosecuting before. Although I am certain that you personally have not had your decision-making process compromised, the ap

any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Cassell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I de

counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose the Motion to Intervene. Respectfully submitted, is/ Bruce E. Reinhart BRUCE E. REINHART,

ates" means the President, the Via President, and any current Federal employee (including an individual appointed as an employee or detailed to the Federal Government under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3371-3376)) who is detailed to or employed by any: (i) Agency (including a Government corporati

h any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiffs Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Cassell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I de

counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose the Motion to Intervene. Respectfully submitted, hi Bruce E. Reinhart BRUCE E. REINHART,P

ates" means the President, the Via President, and any current Federal employee (including an individual appointed as an employee or detailed to the Federal Government under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3371-3376)) who is detailed to or employed by any: (i) Agency (including a Government corporati

any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Ca.qgell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I d

tes" means the President, the Vice President, and any current Federal employee (including an individual appointed as an employee or detailed to the Federal Government under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3371-3376)) who is detailed to or employed by any: (i) Agency (including a Government corporati