Epstein Secrets

t the United States, so the general six-year statute of limitations for suits against the United States applies." Id. hgt 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a), and Edwards Shalala, 64 F.3d 601, 605 (11'h Cir. 1995)(finding that section 2401(a) "sets an outside time limit on suits against the United States"). A "claim

lawsuits had to be based on the sexual abuse by Epstein. In a telephone interview conducted on April 7, 2011, by Jack Scarola, Esq., representing Brad Edwards, Esq. in Epstein'. Rothstein. Edwards. and L.M. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Fla.), Jane Doe #3 stated she wa

tes District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehr

n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction." The Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case. United States Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974). "It follows,

f victims provided to Mr. Epstein's counsel and did not receive either of the victim notification letters. She is, however, represented by Attorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who received both the initial and corrected victim notification letters that were sent to Jane Doe #1.

esolved on September 2, 2008, and on September 3, 2008, your Affiant sent the corrected victim notification letter to Jane Doe 41 via her attorney, Brad Edwards, Esq. 10. As explained in the July 9, 2008 Declaration, at the time that the Agreement was negotiated, Jane Doe #2 was represented by an attorney

ication letters. She is, however, represented by Attorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who r

ial actions is dri in th irony. We respectfully call your attention to the transcript of the interview with and guide you — as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wi malting judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view herse

f victims provided to Mr. Epstein's counsel and did not receive either of the victim notification letters. She is, however, represented by Attorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who received both the initial and corrected victim notification letters that were sent to Jane Doe #1.

esolved on September 2, 2008, and on September 3, 2008, your Affiant sent the corrected victim notification letter to Jane Doe 41 via her attorney, Brad Edwards, Esq. 10. As explained in the July 9, 2008 Declaration, at the time that the Agreement was negotiated, Jane Doe #2 was represented by an attorney

ication letters. She is, however, represented by Attorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who r

torial actions is dri in irony. We respectfully call your attention to the transcript of the interview with .nd guide you — as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wi malting judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. did not in any manner view herself as

the United States, so the general six-year statute of limitations for suits against the United States applies." Id. citing 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a), and Edwards v. Shalala, 64 F.3d 601, 605 (11th Cir. 1995)(finding that section 2401(a) "sets an outside time limit on suits against the United States"). A "cla

lawsuits had to be based on the sexual abuse by Epstein. In a telephone interview conducted on April 7, 2011, by Jack Scarola, Esq., representing Brad Edwards, Esq. in Epstein v. Rothstein. Edwards. and L.M., Jane Doe #3 stated she was first contacted by the FBI "in 2007 sometime." Exhibit C at 18. She was

n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction." The Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case. United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974). "It follows