Epstein Secrets

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

spiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with

Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were calculated

of RRA. 5. Defendant, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant he

STEIN, (hereinafter 'EPST.EIN"), by and through. tie Utideraigned attorneys, files this. action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, IndiVidually, BRADLEY-J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., individually. ACC0rdingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyerS and emplOyee

nd illegal investment scheme is also evidenced by the filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 05930

cum for Deposition, dated November 5, 2009, upon Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.; Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; Stuart Rosenfel

1 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-522-3456 Fax: 954-527-8663 bedwar

which were entered into by an investor relating to any plaintiff's case with Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: a. Scott W. Rothstein b. Bradley J. Edwards C. RRA e. any entity formed by RRA or Bradley J. Edwards or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third party investors to inv

and proper. Rule 7 .1 A. 3. Certification of Pre-Filing Conference Counsel for Defendant in good faith conferred with Plaintiff's counsel, Bradley Edwards, by telephone and Mr. Edwards does not oppose the entry of an order. Counsel for Defendant wrote and enclosed copies of this motion and proposed ag

e entry of an order. Counsel for Defendant wrote and enclosed copies of this motion and proposed agreed orders to Kendall Coffey, Esq., counsel for Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, individually, and Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., Coffey Burlington 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse, Miami, Florida 33133, and Paul Singerm

ulted her when she was a minors. The parties recently reached a confidential settlement of this lawsuit on the eve of trial. 4. Movant's counsel, Brad Edwards was employed by RRA. During this time Attorney Edwards securely and confidentially maintained hard-copies of certain file materials and maintained

d a confidential settlement of this lawsuit on the eve of trial. 4. Movant's counsel, Brad Edwards was employed by RRA. During this time Attorney Edwards securely and confidentially maintained hard-copies of certain file materials and maintained substantial parts of client case files and investigative

eeking production from Trustee Herbert Stettin of Attorney Edwards case files and investigative files which relate

stant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street 7th Floor Miami, Florida 33132 Phone: (305) 961-9176 Fax: (305) 536-7599 [email protected] Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Esq. (VIA EMAIL) Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 [email protected]

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. I Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., Individually, Defendants. 50 2009 UV 0 3 MCCUE COMPLAINT COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING DEC Q t 2QP enAriory n. POCK CLAR

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

eme. e) After EDWARDS was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attomey EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory a

nd illegal investment scheme is also evidenced by the filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 05930

EY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: Defendants. COMPLAINT SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other l

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and Is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

nd illegal investment scheme is also evidenced by the filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 05930

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, STUART ROSENFELDT, individually, WILLIAM BERGER, individually, RUSSELL ADLER, individually, DEBBIE VILLEGAS, individually, DAVID

sociate, partner, shareholder, and/or other representative of RRA. EFTA00725320 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 3 8. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

gal investment scheme is also evidenced by the recent filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A EFTA00725333 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, individually,

n, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, STUART ROSENFELDT, individually, RUSSELL ADLER, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, WILLIAM BERGER, individually, KENNETH JENNE, individually, MICHAEL FISTEN, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. COM

involving alleged Epstein settlements (current and future) and other alleged matters. 4. ROTHSTEIN and others in RRA, including, BERGER, ADLER and EDWARDS, abused the legal process, by not simply aggressively litigating existing cases, but conducting discovery and making media presentations that far e

gal investment scheme is also evidenced by the recent filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, individually, (a named Defendant herein), and RRA, against R