Epstein Secrets

inor females, including 3. In about April 2008, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., was a licensed attorney in Florida, practicing

RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 RESPONSE OF= BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. AND FARMER. JAFFE. WEISSING, EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN. P.L TO CREDITORS MOTION TO CLARIFY PRIOR ORDERS (a minor victim of sex offenses), Bradley J. Edwards, and Fanner, Jaffe, Weissin

ral statute providing for compensation to victims of child sexual abuse, 18 U.S.C. § 2255. 7. On September 11, 2008, at the request of his client Brad Edwards filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault on Around the same time, he also filed suits for 8. At abou

ile they were minor girls. 4. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent on July 2, 2008, attorney E

. Indeed, the obligation to produce a privilege log is not even triggered until there has been an initial determination of relevancy. See Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (Fla. App. 2006) ("Before a written objection to a request for production of documents is ruled upon, the documents are not 'ot

than two dozen teens who suedhim. Responding to requests from Epstein’s attorneys in a complex lawsuit that was spawned by the sex scandal, attorney Bradley Edwards said the politically-connected 64-year-old convicted sex offender paid more than St million to each of the three women Edwards represented. Identifie

sents three of the young women, believes' that none of the 30 to 40 woman identified as victims in the federal investigation were told ahead of time. Edwards said his: clients received letters from the U.S. Attorney’s Office months after the deal Was signed, assuring them Epstein would be prosecuted. "Neve

and creditors said they were pleased with the outcome. "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people .. . who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaum, a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the most for c

an two dozen teens who sued him. Responding to requests from Epstein's attorneys in a complex lawsuit that was spawned by the sex scandal, attorney Bradley Edwards said the politically-connected 64-year-old convicted sex offender paid more than $1 million to each of the three women Edwards represented. Identif

nts three of the young women, believes that none of the 30 to 40 woman identified as victims in the federal investigation were told ahead of time. Edwards said his clients received letters from the U.S. Attorney's Office months after the deal was signed, assuring them Epstein would be prosecuted. "Ne

nd creditors said they were pleased with the outcome. "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people ... who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaum, a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the most for

#291874/mep JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendant(s). IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

r January 20, 2011. The deposition was cancelled upon an agreement reached between counsel for Epstein and the Trustee respectively. EFTA00599571 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG 3. Plaintiff failed to serve the Trustee Depo Notice on Defendant/Counter-Claimant Bradley J. Edwar

exceed the scope. The Court must rule on the objections and the scope of discovery before Defendant has any duty to file a privilege log. Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (4th DCA 2006). "A party is required to file a log only if the information is `otherwise discoverable!" Gosman at 296 (referri

#291874/mep JEFFREY EPSTErN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORI

r January 20, 2011. The deposition was cancelled upon an agreement reached between counsel for Epstein and the Trustee respectively. EFTA00283658 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG 3. Plaintiff failed to serve the Trustee Depo Notice on Defendant/Counter-Claimant Bradley J. Edwar

exceed the scope. The Court must rule on the objections and the scope of discovery before Defendant has any duty to file a privilege log. Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (4th DCA 2006). "A party is required to file a log only if the information is `otherwise discoverable!" Gosman at 296 (referri

:27:00 PM 29 J8RsEPSl 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 It would be helpful if, in doing that,1 if counsel — I Mr. Edwards and I see and I see Mr. Boise as well — I know they are counsel to several, at least several of the victims. It would be helpful if whoever is speaki

than two dozen teens who sued him. Responding to requests from Epstein’s attorneys in a complex lawsuit that was spawned by the sex scandal, attorney Bradley Edwards said the politically-connected 64-year-old convicted sex offender paid more than $1 million to each of the three women Edwards represented. Identifie

and creditors said they were pleased with the outcome, "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people . ,. who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaumj a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the-most for c

ehalf of Intertstal Party Farmer, Jale, Weissing, Edwards, Finos 6. Lehniumill. mieMei D Ltir behalf_ofDd

th LLC Bruce H Lehr on behalf of Defendant Stuart Rosenfeldt • • f oftretlitor White Oak 0 kabal Advisors LLC • f of Creditor Todd Snyder 1 1 Luzinski Camilo Mutrique c/o Marianella Morales • ' de Kra Ric :4,1() https://ecf.flsb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispateh.pl?571963 140018278 3/25/2011 EF