Epstein Secrets

tance that you discussed the contents of the documents with? A I don't recall anybody except my attorneys. Q Did you have any communication with Bradley Edwards regarding the content of those documents? A I don't recall. Q Since receiving those documents, did you have any communication with Bradley Edwar

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA: This is the subpoena duces tecum issued in t

te Court issues and not to be considered in the Show Cause proceedings. 2 EFTA00793402 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6482 Filed 10/19/18 Page 3 of 97 EDWARDS: ... The representation was made on the record by Mr. Link that he provided it within his law firm and his client, that being Mr. Epstein. When fur

cribe the contents? A When you say documents, you mean pages? I'm sorry? Q Yes, sir. Pages. A Well, I can remember the emails with respect to Brad Edwards -- Q Excuse me. Pardon me. I'm stopping you, sir. That's no responsive to my question. And I don't want you on this record to be disclosing the co

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. CASSELL: Can I just chime in here? Paul Cassell for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, intervenors in the Florida State court action. THEREUPON, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, being a witness in the notice heretofore filed, and being first duly sworn in the above cause, testif

tance that you discussed the contents of the documents with? A I don't recall anybody except my attorneys. Q Did you have any communication with Bradley Edwards regarding the content of those documents? A I don't recall. Q Since receiving those documents, did you have any communication with Bradley Edwar

a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA: This is the subpoena duces tecum issued in the

ed from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA

.M., E.W., and Jane Doe 10 EFTA00793508 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6488 Filed 10/22/18 Page 11 of 165 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FLBN Brittany N. Henderson FLBN 118247 Edwards Pottinger LLC Attorneys for Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Jack Scarola, Esi= Fl

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. CASSELL: Can I just chime in here? Paul Cassell for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, intervenors in the Florida State court action. THEREUPON, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, being a witness in the notice heretofore filed, and being first duly sworn in the above cause, testif

STOS, LEHRMAN, P.L. Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for

fer facts to a jury, statements to a jury, that they are going to be then arguing are credible, and so we have this joinder motion, drafted by Mr. Edwards and Mr. Cassell, that they would like to introduce into evidence, whole cloth into evidence, that contains the legal arguments and the statements o

there's an additional argument from counsel. It was their motion, so if it is, then -- THE COURT: Yes. Okay. MR. EDWARDS: And by the way, this is Brad Edwards on behalf of Ms. but I believe it's their up. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, a couple more points. They are related to what was just articulated for

nsense. You want to take the backdrop to this in terms of what the investigation was, there were a number of individuals that were presented to the Florida State grand jury as a result of the state investigation. Maxwell was not one of them. Not at all. Never on anybody's radar about any of this. She didn't

, LEHRMAN, P.L. Attorneys for Plaintiff 20 BY: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. 21 HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys

to 2 a jury, statements to a jury, that they are going to be then 3 arguing are credible, and so we have this joinder motion, 4 drafted by Mr. Edwards and Mr. Cassell, that they would like to 5 introduce into evidence, whole cloth into evidence, that 6 contains the legal arguments and the statem

tional 19 argument from counsel. It was their motion, so if it is, 20 then -- 21 THE COURT: Yes. Okay. 22 MR. EDWARDS: And by the way, this is Brad Edwards on 23 behalf of Ms. but I believe it's their up. 24 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, a couple more points. 25 They are related to what was just arti

You want to take the backdrop to this in terms of 17 what the investigation was, there were a number of individuals 18 that were presented to the Florida State grand jury as a result 19 of the state investigation. Maxwell was not one of them. Not 20 at all. Never on anybody's radar about any of this. She

ther plaintiffs' attorneys, such as First AUSA Sloman's former law partner, Jeffrey Herman (see below), and Ms. Villafana's confidential informant, Brad Edwards (see below), to obtain assistance from Ms. Villafana and the USAO in their cases against Mr. Epstein. Moreover, during the course of the civil liti

("RRA"). RRA, Mr. Rothstein and others at RRA perpetrated the largest Ponzi scheme in Florida's history, using the very same civil cases that Mr. Edwards litigated against Mr. Epstein to fleece investors out of millions of dollars. Incredibly, Ms. Villafana was working with Mr. Edwards on this obstruc

s virtually every weekend to see his mother or brother or to conduct business. Upon initiating the investigation, without any coordination with the Florida State Attorney's Office and in clear conflict with the Justice Department's Petite Policy, Ms. Villafana immediately issued irrelevant official document