Epstein Secrets

EY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees

ey Edwards whether he would withdraw them in exchange for an affidavit from Mr. Rush attesting to the fact that he had interviewed Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards said he would not. 10. On Friday, April 30, 2010, I received service of a subpoena from Doe's counsel requiring movant journalist George Rush to a

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

e article have been deposed in this matter, and that none of those individuals have refuted the article during their depositions. Additionally, Ms. Mellon's counsel stated that Ms. Mellon was deposed in this matter by the plaintiffs on May 26, 2006, during which Ms. Mellon answered several questions as

189) On March 24, 2008, the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on the instant motion. Attorney Richard Hollow appeared on behalf of Ms. Mellon, attorneys Martha McCampbell and Gary Prince appeared on behalf of the defendants, and attorney Jonathan Scruggs appeared on behalf of the crtnnir

EY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees

ey Edwards whether he would withdraw them in exchange for an affidavit from Mr. Rush attesting to the fact that he had interviewed Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards said he would not. 10. On Friday, April 30, 2010, I received service of a subpoena from Doe's counsel requiring movant journalist George Rush to a

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

e article have been deposed in this matter, and that none of those individuals have refuted the article during their depositions. Additionally, Ms. Mellon's counsel stated that Ms. Mellon was deposed in this matter by the plaintiffs on May 26, 2006, during which Ms. Mellon answered several questions as

189) On March 24, 2008, the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on the instant motion. Attorney Richard Hollow appeared on behalf of Ms. Mellon, attorneys Martha McCampbell and Gary Prince appeared on behalf of the defendants, and attorney Jonathan Scruggs appeared on behalf of the crtnnir

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPEARANCES FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN BY: BRADLEY EDWARDS, ESQ. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-3268 ALSO PRESENT: MICHAEL FISTEN U.S. Legal Support (305) 373-8404 EFT

as called as a witness by the Plaintiff and, after having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. EDWARDS: Q. Tell us your name. A. Q. And just to the get to the point, you know who Jeffrey Epstein is? A. Yes. Q. And you've met him before? A.

19 21:4 22:22 23:3,4 24:4 24:10 25:13 31:12 37:23 44:17 49:1,2 5S:21 62:12 65:25 66:3 meet 3:19,21 4:8 6:25 49:17,22 56:7 meeting5:4 53:S Mellon 10:23 11:10 memory45:12 mentalities 43:8 mention47:11 mentioned45:19 met 3:13,17 6:12 6:14 16:2,4,7 20:2 36:3,7 38:5,9,17 Miamil:11 3:22 6