Epstein Secrets

lbath, with the agreement of the Palm Beach Post, Brad Edwards, Esq. and Spencer Kuvin, Esq. agreed that the "l

This Improper Motion Practice And Have No Demonstrable Need For More Several depositions have occurred over the last 4 weeks wherein it appears Mr. Edwards already has the information he seeks responsive to these requests, which is likely the reason Mr. Edwards has not filed any affidavits supporting t

s has not run, double jeopardy does not apply, and there are no other concrete indications that criminal prosecution is barred. See also Belmonte v Lawson, 750 F. Supp. 735, 739 (E.D. Va. 1990)("Courts should avoid engaging in crystal ball forecasts about what a prosecutor may or may not do ... ). Si

uly 10 2009 Ftespeclftfiy Sul:mitred. Bradley J Edwards Bradley J Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER L

have conferred with opposing counsel On the issues raised n Mrs motion and no resolution was possere DATED July 10 2009 Ftespeclftfiy Sul:mitred. Bradley J Edwards Bradley J Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Ores Blvd Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 Telephone (95

ons legating this lawsed however my xnengys nave ces Haled me that al the present time I Cannot select ostrx and produce documents relevant to thus Lawson and I must .Mcii dawn) Or alga losing my Seth Amendment ignt to effective 7 SDNY_GM_00328571 EFTA_0020 I 323 EFTA01308049 Case I 05, • hi.ki

ha Dutt Soumitra Dutta Colin Dyer Alexander V. Dyukov Victor J. Dzau Paul N. Eckley Elizabeth C. Economy Richard W. Edelman Brigitte Ederer Bruce Edwards Agustin E. Edwards John Ehara Jack Ehnes Ralph Eichler J0rg Eigendorf Maria Eitel Stuart E. Eizenstat Daniel Ek Klas Eklund Co-Founder and

onomy Richard W. Edelman Brigitte Ederer Bruce Edwards Agustin E. Edwards John Ehara Jack Ehnes Ralp

ale Tinubu Michael Tipsord Vasily N. Titov Senior Vice-President and General Manager. Digital Enterprise Solutions Business Unit Board Member. Lawson: Professor. Graduate School of Tama University Vice-President, Corporate Affairs Associate Editor Chief Executive Officer, USA Cyber Illusionist

e Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA- I met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regardingJeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for= who had alleged that she is a victim

016, AUSA- I met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regardingJeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for= who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell.28 (Ex. 5 at 1).29 At

Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (tbl.) 5 United States v. Laurenti, 581 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1978) 79 xvi EFTA00099957 United States v. Lawson, 683 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1982) United States v. Leo Sure Chief, 438 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 2006) United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 60, 78 3

ee Ex. 4 at 1).22 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwe

Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (tbl.) 5 United States v. Laurenti, 581 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1978) 79 xvi EFTA00077622 United States v. Lawson, 683 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1982) United States v. Leo Sure Chief 438 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 2006) United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 60, 78 33

ee Ex. 4 at 1).22 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwe

Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (tbl.) 5 United States v. Laurenti, 581 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1978) 79 xvi EFTA00039437 United States v. Lawson, 683 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1982) United States v. Leo Sure Chief 438 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 2006) United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 60, 78 33

1) Doe No. 1. v. United States, 32, 104 33 86 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 117, 118, 119 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 52 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No 00 Civ. 2290 (RIS), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 155 Falter v. United States, 23 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1928) 34 Falter,

ee Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

, 114 United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) 4, 6 United States v. Laurenti, 581 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1978) 53 United States v. Lawson, 683 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1982) 42, 53 United States v. Leo Sure Chief 438 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 2006) 26, 29, 34 United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 89

ee Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for who had alleged that she is a victim

016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell.28 (Ex. 5 at I).29 At t

Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (tbl.) 5 United States v. Laurenti, 581 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1978) 79 xvi EFTA00103015 United States v. Lawson, 683 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1982) United States v. Leo Sure Chief 438 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 2006) United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 60, 78 33

position. It's in the 3 criminal complaint. The truth is different from 4 what's in both the criminal complaint and in that FBI 5 affidavit, and in Brad Edward's own statements on the 6 subject. 7 The truth is that Alfredo Rodriguez was 8 deposed twice, once in July and once in August. And 9 in the

RICO investigation 16 for that entire time, creating fake evidence in 17 Epstein's case. 18 And she had just filed hidden secret using 19 Edwards to overturn the NPA by filing the -- this 20 CVRA case, that sole purpose was to overturn it. And 21 so when he approached her with the list, this w

0:4 130:16 149:15 160:15 195:14,22 latter 185:23 laughs 54:15 launching 9:5,7 laundering 57:8 law 16:21 41:7,22 52:1 80:3 127:23 166:21 166:23 186:20 Lawson 129:25 lawyer 3:17 5:6,13 6:11 146:9 155:25 166:23 170:2,13,13 lawyers 8:4 52:9,13,20 53:22 74:6 172:23 209:9 209:10 lead 169:20,21 leading 212:25 Le

04:10,11 109:18 110:16,20 111:15 111:24 128:17 134:9 160:3 210:13 earth 123:16 143:16 158:22,23 Easily 53:10 easy 207:21 edging 11:2 education 118:14 Edwards 146:9 166:24 167:1,6 167:21 168:1,9,12 168:15 169:23 170:1,6,12,19,25 171:1,20 172:18 173:8,17 174:9 176:15 Edward's 168:5 effort 92:1,18 170:22 Ehud

0:4 130:16 149:15 160:15 195:14,22 latter 185:23 laughs 54:15 launching 9:5,7 laundering 57:8 law 16:21 41:7,22 52:1 80:3 127:23 166:21 166:23 186:20 Lawson 129:25 lawyer 3:17 5:6,13 6:11 146:9 155:25 166:23 170:2,13,13 lawyers 8:4 52:9,13,20 53:22 74:6 172:23 209:9 209:10 lead 169:20,21 leading 212:25 Le