Epstein Secrets

n that we believe is material to the victims' CVRA case — a limited amount of information that could be swiftly located by your Office." Letter from Bradley J. Edwards & Paul G. Cassell to Wifiedo A. Ferrer, Mar. I, 2011. The victims have, for example, requested that the U.S. Attorney's Office provide to them unreda

tes District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehr

nited States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV- United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 54 EF

urate information came to be made a part of the record and the extent to which Mr. Epstein, through his attorneys, was culpable. Sincirely, BE/sg Brad Edwards SECTS KADRDWARDSLAW COM EFTA00230161 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT

the CVRA and victim notices. All relevant evidence is admissible. See Fed. R. Evict. 402. Relevant evidence is "broadly defined," United States v. Glasser, 773 F.2d 1553, 1560 (11i° Cir. 1985), as evidence that has "any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determina

pondence in the [CVRA] lawsuit[] 2 EFTA00208340 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 3 of 10 Letter from Bradley J. Edwards to Robert D. Critton, Jr., Case No. 9:08-CV-80893, Doc. #214 (attachment 2). On September 2, 2010, Epstein filed a motion for a protective order, s

s publicly accessible records. DATED: March 21, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimile Florida Bar No.: E-mail: and Pau

the CVRA and victim notices. All relevant evidence is admissible. See Fed. R. Evid. 402. Relevant evidence is "broadly defined," United States v. Glasser, 773 F.2d 1553, 1560 (11th Cir. 1985), as evidence that has "any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determina

also, Ander- son United States, 8 Cir., 1966, 369 F.2d 1, 19, cert. denied, 1967, 386 U.S. 976, 87 S.Ct. 1171, 18 L.Ed.2d 136; ago, this court. Edwards United States. 8 Cir., 1966, 361 F.2d 32, 734. The District Court in this case found that these elements were lacking: *e art in complete ac- cor

t. Davidson United States, 8 Cir., 61 F.2d 260. e agreement of conspiracy may, of course, be proven and established by circumstantial evidence. Glasser v. United States, 815 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 467, 86 LEd. 680; Clune I United States, 169 U.S. 590, 16 S.Ct. 125, 40 EFTA00192272 BUTORD v. min= STAT