Epstein Secrets

his own sexual perversions. Ile scores as a Level III Sex Offender with absolu►ely no basis for downward depanure. EFTA00232642 A77 Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz Requesting a Continuance of the Hearing, dated September 9, 2010 09/07/2010 09:55 FAX 0 2:00 2 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP NIO ar

hearing on this matter if that would be acceptable to the Court. We are available to discuss at the Court's convenience. Respe» fully submitted, . Lefkowitz, P.C. Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington. O. C. EFTA00232643 A78 Letter from Suprem

e calendar, matter of Jeffrey Epstein. Your appearances please. MS. GAFFNEY: Gaffney for the People. Good afternoon, Your Honor. MR. LEFKOWITZ: Jay Lefkowdtz and Sandra Musumeci for Mr. Epstein. THE COURT: Mr. Epstein is not here. MR. LEFKOWITZ: That's correct. THE COURT: Are you waiving his appearance

eprivation of liberty or stigma," due process demands "more than average certainty on the part of the factfmder." E.B., 119 F.3d at 1110-11 (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 756- 58 (1982)). Accordingly, "registrants are entitled to have the burden of persuasion placed on the state, with the state obligate

is own sexual perversions. l le scores as a Level ill Sex Offender with absolutely no basis for downward departure. EFTA00231522 A77 Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz Requesting a Continuance of the Hearing. dated September 9, 2010 09/0T/2010 09:55 FAX rihon2,,no2 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP ANO

a hearing on this matter if that would be acceptable to the Court. We are available to discuss at the Court's convenience. Respectfully submitted, Lefkowitz, P.C. Chicago Hong Kong Lor1000 Los Angeles Memel Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington. 0 C. EFTA00231523 A78 Letter from Supreme

privation of liberty or stigma," due process demands "more than average certainty on the part of the factfinder." E.B., 119 F.3d at 1110-11 (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 756- 58 (1982)). Accordingly, "registrants are entitled to have the burden of persuasion placed on the state, with the state obligate

llant. rI BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JAY P. LEFKOWITZ SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI KnAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lex

privation of liberty or stigma," due process demands "more than average certainty on the part of the factfinder." E.B., 119 F.3d at 1110-11 (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 756- 58 (1982)). Accordingly, "registrants are entitled to have the burden of persuasion placed on the state, with the state obligate