Epstein Secrets

ound September 2007. plea discussions took place between Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (including lead criminal defense counsel Jay Leflcowitz), and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneyed others. The plea discussions gener

Lefkowitz stain . SIMIMMISIO U.S. Attorney's Correspondence at 156. 15. On about September 26, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent an e-mail to Lefkowitz in which she stated• arnale EFTA00229924 Case 9:O8-cv-80736-KAM Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 9 of 42 Apparently the ' gree

possible prosecution. Tr. July 11, 2008, at 4-6, 18-19, 22-23, 28-29. 23. On about November 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. AttorneMM sent an e-mail to Jay Leikowitz, defense counsel for Epstein. The e-mail stated that the U.S. Attorney's Office had an obligation to notify the victims S 12 EFTA00229928 7.7

tein's counsel U.S. Attorney's Correspondence at 153 (emphases added). 14. On about September 25, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent an email to Lefkowitz stain . SIMIMMISIO U.S. Attorney's Correspondence at 156. 15. On about September 26, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent an e-mail to Lefkowitz

t to the good faith approval of Epstein's counsel, selecting the attorney representative for the individuals identified under the Agreement. If the United Suites tin to assign this responsibility to an independent third-party, both the United States and Epstein retain the right to take good faith objections t

tion of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10

e counsel: the Agreement and the addendum thereto; the USAO's letter of Crime Victims' Rights —Notification of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 23, 2007; R. Alexander Acosta's l

sexual conduct must be: an "efficient and compelling purpose," United Stake v. Meacham 115 F.3d 1458, 1495 (10° Cir. 1997); a "motivating purpose " United Suites v. clugfc1.1, 49 F.3d 1079, 1083 (5° Cir. 1995). Of "at least one of the defendant's motivations for taking the trip in the first place," united St

ely to reach th&Palm Beach area. U.S. Attorney's Correspondence at 29. 13. On about September 24, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent an e-mail to Jay Lefkowitz, criminal defense counsel for Epstein, regarding the agreement. The e-mail stated that the Government and Epstein's counsel U.S. Attorney's Corresp

eflcowitz statingSeallISS SS U.S. Attorney's Correspondence at 156. 15. On about September 26, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent an e-mail to Lefkowitz in which she stated• B 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000678 EFTA00230502 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 9 of 42

ct to the good faith approval of Epstein's counsel, selecting the attorney representative for the individuals identified under the Agreanent If the United Suites elects to assign this responsibility to an independent third-parry, both the United States and Epstein retain the right to take good faith objection

h. I did dos in an attempt to avoid what I foresaw would likely be a litigious selection peoceSs. It was only after I ptoposcd this change that Mr. Lefkowitz raised with nie his enumerated conceals. 2 Seethe' 22M provides that: "rainy person who. while a minor, was a victim of a violation of le:numerated

im el a violation of [enumerated sections. of Tiik IRV and who suffers personal injury as a I eSull of such violation . may sue in asp• appropriate United Suites District Coon and shall recover the actual damages such'persini sustains and the• cost of the suit. sealudury a reasonable anorney's fee.- EFTA0017