Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 7, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorne
To be Argued By: JAY P. LEFKOWITZ New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 .e
claim that is belied by the record? — the hearing court should not have scored Appellant for the majority of allegations which formed the basis of the Level 3 Order. See Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). Accordingly, the Order 6 By previewi
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
re for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In
omptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorn
laimed by the People on the records -- the hearing court should not have scored Appellant for the majority of allegations which formed the basis of the Level 3 Order. See Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). B. The People's Attempt to Introduce
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
omptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorn
are for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In
claim that is belied by the records -- the hearing court should not have scored Appellant for the majority of allegations which formed the basis of the Level 3 Order. See Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). Accordingly, the Order adjudging App
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (45)
Entities connected to both Jay Lefkowitz and the Level 3 Order
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,517 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON314 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON139 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
New York
LOCATION69 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION59 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON54 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON27 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
Samantha Power
PERSON24 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
New York State
LOCATION22 w/ Jay·2 w/ the
SM
Sandra Lynn Musumeci
PERSON18 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
MW
M. Weinberg
PERSON13 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
the District Attorney's
LOCATION10 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
Appellant
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
Felony Solicitation for Prostitution
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Jay·2 w/ the
Criminal Term
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
DIGITAL-SUBMISSION COMPLIANCE
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
TY
Typeface
PERSON7 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
PM
People v. Mingo
PERSON6 w/ Jay·3 w/ the
Federal Courts
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Jay·2 w/ the
the Appellate Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jay·3 w/ the