Epstein Secrets

construed as an admission of civil or criminal liability in regards to any of those who seek compensation from the Trust. See draft proposal from Jay Lelkowitz to Andrew l.nurie dated September 15. 2007. In response, Ms. • nded that the Agreement contain language considering the inclusion of guardian ad M

ch. I did this in an attempt to avoid what I foresaw would likely be 'litigious seleaion process. It was only after I proposed this change that Mr. Lelkowitz raised with me his enumerated concerns. 2 Section 2255 provides that: "[tiny person who, while' minor, was' victim of violation of [enumerated secti

dentified victims and Epstein's counsel may contort the identified victims through that counsel. Sere draft non-pmsecutio agreement nailed from to Lelkowitz dated September 17. 20117. The inclusion of I guardian ad litem. however. only served to complicate mailers. We continued to reiterate our objectio

ng that Mr. Epstein deprive himself of rights accorded to him as' potential civil defendant. While we are aware one of the responsibilities of your Olliee is to provide tor restitution for victims of crimes, this does not give the government the responsibility to enable alleged victims to collect' civ

AFLS) Subject: Re: Follow up - Thanks. Jeff, are we all set? Jay Original Message From: " , (USAFLS)" Sent: 10/18/2007 12:15 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Cc: " , Jeff (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Follow up Jeff -- Can you see any issues with this? If not, please confirm with Jay. Original Message From: J

d by the FBI to confirm whether they were 17 or 18 at the time of their activity with Mr. Epstein." See Tab 26, September 24, 2007 Email from M. to J. Lefkowitz (emphasis added). This statement indicated that, at least the "six others" (and, as it turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the a

to confer with your co-counsel regarding this matter. Although the language of Paragraph 8 could be so construed, our First Assistant informed Mr. Lefkowitz some weeks ago that this was not our position. As Mr. Lefkowitz has noted, were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims in a subsequen

charges against Mr. Epstein or the proper state procedures under which he will plead or be sentenced arc appropriately made to the State Attorney's Olliee. Continued federal inv ve e t in this matter its led to an impropriety that was unanticipated us well. Ms. attempted to manipulate the terms of Mr

ct that Bert Ocariz is a friend of my boyfriend and that I have a "longstanding relationship" with Mr. Ocariz. RFP MIA 000464 EFTA00208945 • • JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 2 OF 5 I informed you that I selected Mr. Ocariz because he was a friend and classmate of two people whom I respecte

es." See Tab 37, February 27, 2008 Email from J. Again, that claim was utterly false; Mr. Thomas's contemporaneous hand-written notes, reviewed by Jay Lefkowitz, confirm that the USAO had violated settled Department policy and ethical rules by providing case-specific information about the Department's legal

ese requests. we would ask that you determine whether the investigative team ever provided these trustworthy tapes and transcripts to those in your Olliee who were being asked to authorize the prosecution so that they could themselves assess the reliability of the no interview reports against a verbati