Epstein Secrets

hat any appeal to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. Oo September 7, 2007, T, along with FAUSA AUSAs and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitc, and Ms. Sanchez. Iunderstoodthat you wished to present federalism-bawd co ow prosecution. To ensure a Mil consideration of your argument% I invit

self, Professor Dashowite, former United States Attorney Guy Lewis. Ms. Lilly Ann Sanchez and Messrs. Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, Gary Letkourt and Jay Lcfkowitz had the opportunity to review and raise objections to the terms of the Agreement Again, no one raised objections to the Section 2255 language. Sin

nt U.S. Attorney AUSA EFTA00207614 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 100224675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 500 S Australian

ty to review and raise objections to the terms of the Agreement Again, no one raised objections to the Section 2255 language. Since the signing of theAgreement, the defense team and our Office have addressed several Issues that have arisen under the Agreement. Although the exchanges were at times a bit liti

ATES ATTORNEY cc: -7- EFTA00213821 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 100224675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 500 S Australian

f that any appeal to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. On September 7, 2007,1, along witaIMIMMIIMIEM and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowilz, and Ma. Sanchez. Iunderstoodtbat you wished to present federalism-based concerto regarding our prosecution. To ensure a sill consideretioe of your

eeting, and after conferring with the FIN and with Chief Oosterbaan, our Office decided toproceed with the indictment. At that time, I reminded Mr. LetkowItz that be bad previously Indicated his desire to appeal such a decision to the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or the Assistant Attorne

ity to review and rain objections to the terms of the Agreement Again, no one raised objections to the Section 2255 language. Since the signing of theAgreement, the defense team and our Office have addressed several Issues that have arisen under the Agreement. Although the exchanges were at times a bit liti

e terms of the Agreement by failing to "withdraw [Epstein's] pending motion to intervene and to quash certain grand jury subpoenas." EFTA00289829 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 5 OF 5 With respect to Ms. N I contacted her attorney — who was paid for by Mr. Epstein and was directed by I for

to confer with your co-counsel regarding this matter. Although the language of Paragraph S could be so conitimed, our First Assistant informed Mr. Lefkowitt some weeks ago that this was not our position. As Mr. Ladkowitz baa noted, were Mr. F.pstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims M a subsequen

s, defense counsel suggested several similar arrangements, including a Trust !bad. Again, our decision not to ante a fund flows from our belief that theAgreement sbouldprovicie the same Taken) the victims as they would have been entitled had we proceeded to trial. A restitution land or trust fund would place