Epstein Secrets

f, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite1300 Miami, FL 33131 305-371-6421 represented by Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland & Ellis, LLP Martin G. Weinberg Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. Roy Eric Black Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf https://ecf flsd.circltdcn/cgi

in Weinberg. Filing Fee $ 75.00. Receipt # 16719. (ksa) (Entered: 04/05/2011) 04/07/2011 5_¢ MOTION to Intervene of Roy Black Martin Weinberg, and Jay LeJkowitz by Roy Black. (Perczek, Jacqueline) (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/07/2011 57 Defendant's MOTION for Leave to File Memorandum of Law In Excess of Twenty

2011. (ir) (Entered: 09/26/2011) 09/27/2011 100 RESPONSE/REPLY to 94 Supplement Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz by United States of America. ( Ann Marie) (Entered: 09/27/2011) 09/28/2011 i (Court only) ***Motions terminated: 41 Plaintiffs MOTION for Summa

oy Black Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz Response to Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Leficowitz (DE 94) filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Jan. 18, 2011 Hrg. TranscriptXEdwards, Bradley) (Entered: 10/10/2011) 10/11/2011 107 ENDORSE

M/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (Ih) (Entered: 03/23/2011) 03/28/2011 54 NOTICE by Roy Black re 5.Q Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the US. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, a Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Use Correspondence to Prov

For Production, Use, And Disclosure Of Plea Negotiations, 161 MOTION for Protective Order Supplemental Briefing Of Intervenors Black, Weinberg, And Lefkowitz In Support Of Their Motion For A Protective Order Concerning Production, Use, And Disclosure Of Plea Negotiations by Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein, Jay Lef

Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf 201 S Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami , FL 33131 USA 305-371-6421 Fax: 305-358-2006 Email:[email protected] Jay P. Lefkowitz PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Kirkland & Ellis. LLP Email:[email protected] Martin G Weinberg PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ma

tered: 09/26/2011) 09/27/2011 100 RESPONSE/REPLY to 94 Supplement Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Black, EFTA00211447 Weinberg. and Lefkowitz by United States of America. 09/27/2011) 09/28/2011 101 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 100 Response/Reply (Other), 94 S

to Contest Any of the Facts by Jane Doe. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 03/21/2011) 03/21/2011 50 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER)(E

/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERC, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ This is a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) by attorneys Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz, to intervene for the

INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERC, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ This is a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civ

omcyJ ay Lefkowitz within the next few days, as soon as a certificate of good standing from the New York Bar arrives. Attorneys Black, Weinberg and Lcfkowitz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the Crime Victims' Rights Act was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate. Instead, t

RELEVANT EVIDENCE Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doc #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing The U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, and states: I. THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT CREATES NO LEGAL DUTY UPON THE U.S. ATT

otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental briefing on the Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is fully briefed. Also, because the proposed interveners seek intervention to request a protective ord

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

ORDER Setting Hearing on pending motions: [79] MOTION to Intervene MOTION for Sanctions, [56] MOTION to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz, [49] Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz, [49] Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe

Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies MOTION for Hearing, [50] Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence : Motion Hearing set for 8/12/2011 02:00 PM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge K

otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental briefing on the Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is fully briefed. Also, because the proposed interveners seek intervention to request a protective ord

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental briefing on the Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is fully briefed. Also, because the proposed interveners seek intervention to request a protective ord

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental briefing on the Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is fully briefed. Also, because the proposed interveners seek intervention to request a protective ord

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

therwise fully advised in the premises. ' The Court is awaiting supplemental briefing on the Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is fully briefed. Also, because the proposed interveners seek intervention to request a protective ord

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental briefing on the Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is fully briefed. Also, because the proposed interveners seek intervention to request a protective ord

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 56) and will rule on that motion after it is

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t