Epstein Secrets

that Epstein's counsel claims that I should be removed from supervising the current investigation and/or disciplined. Mr. Epstein is represented by Jay Lelkowitz, Esq. and Dean Kenneth Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Harvard Law Professor, Alan Dershowitz, Gerald Lefcourt, Esq., Martin Weinberg, Esq., Lilly A

and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz_ In connection with the federal investigation, Epstein added Rimier Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and Jay Lcfkowitz from • Kirkland and Ellis, former U.S. Attorney Guy Lewis, former Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lilly Ann Sanchez and Michael Tien, and Massachusetts de

several times over several months at the request of Epstein's lawyers), so this significant change needed to be dealt with quickly. I explained to Lefkowitz that, unless a case was pending, there was no basis for the United States to file such a motion and there was no basis for the federal court to pay

Division of Corporations and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from lawyer Jeff Herman. Henan told me that he was planning to file a civil lawsuit the next week against Jeffrey Epstein. He said that his clients are frustrated with the lack of

olding adjudication or sentencing, and probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment." I have more than a dozen e-mails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz discussing the U.S. Attorney's insistence on eighteen months of incarceration. You will recall that at one meeting you and Ms. Sanchez raised the id

more than a dozen e-mails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz discussing the U.S. Attorney's insistence on eigh

offensained in A 31t 17 Including 316.1935, 316.027, 316.061, 877311, &sate 893, st 316,193, 316.192, 316.067, 316,072(3), 316.5450), many other °Henan In chapter 916 Wish le ointraffied as s °rhino, 110101011. MANDATORY CQURT COSTS AUTHORIZED BY LOCAL. G01/1„RNMENTAL EN-MIES 5 7...00 Criminal Jan

NE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, and Jeffrey Epstein hereby request that this Honorable Court stay its order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188), denying their Motion for a Protective Ord

ntal Authority of the United States Supreme Court (Doc. 163); and Reply in Support of Supplemental Briefing By Limited Intervenors Black, Weinberg, Lefkowitz, and Epstein (Doc. 169). 3 EFTA00583391 A. The Applicability of Rule 410. Any assessment of the merits of the intervenors' contentions must beg

ly to discuss his or her situation in order to explore the possibility of disposing of the case through a consensual arrangement." United States v. Henan, 544 F.2d 791, 797 (5th Cir. 1977). The Rule is derived from "the inescapable truth that for plea bargaining to work effectively and fairly, a defe

NE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, and Jeffrey Epstein hereby request that this Honorable Court stay its order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188), denying their Motion for a Protective Ord

ntal Authority of the United States Supreme Court (Doc. 163); and Reply in Support of Supplemental Briefing By Limited Intervenors Black, Weinberg, Lefkowitz, and Epstein (Doc. 169). 2 EFTA00584592 Ninety-four percent of state convictions are the result of guilty pleas. The reality is that plea bargai

ly to discuss his or her situation in order to explore the possibility of disposing of the case through a consensual arrangement." United States v. Henan, 544 F.2d 791, 797 (5th Cir. 1977). The Rule is derived from "the inescapable truth that for plea bargaining to work effectively and fairly, a defe