Epstein Secrets

As set forth in caption. There has been no change in the parties. 3. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT OR PETITIONER: Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND ELLI LLP 4. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. NEW YORK DI

OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT OR PETITIONER: Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND ELLI LLP

on of appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein as a Level 3 sexual offender was an abuse of EFTA00589579 discretion and constituted reversible legal error, as the District Attorney's Office agreed that there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a Level 3 designation. 9. THERE IS NO RELATED ACTION OR PROCEEDING NOW PE

x Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Matthew Solum Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE

sa Friel, Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Jennifer Gaffney, Deputy Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Patrick Egan, Sex Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Matthew Solum Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 5, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Cour

ORA Will More Than Adequately Protect the People of the State of New York from Any Negligible Threat Posed by Jeffrey Epstein To come full circle, the District Attorney's Office should take comfort that intentions of SORA will be fully realized by imposing on Jeffrey Epstein a Level 1 designation for his Florida conv

sa Friel, Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Jennifer Gaffney, Deputy Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Patrick Egan, Sex Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010

x Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 7, 2010 SU

evel I Under SORA Will More Than Adequately Protect The People Of New York From Any Negligible Threat Posed By Jeffrey Epstein To come full circle, the District Attorney's Office should take comfort that the intentions of SORA will be fully realized by imposing on Jeffrey Epstein a Level 1 designation for his Florida

sa Friel, Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Jennifer Gaffney, Deputy Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Patrick Egan, Sex Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-

x Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 7, 201

evel I Under SORA Will More Than Adequately Protect The People Of New York From Any Negligible Threat Posed By Jeffrey Epstein To come full circle, the District Attorney's Office should take comfort that the intentions of SORA will be fully realized by imposing on Mr. Jeffrey-Epstein a Level 1 designation for his Flor

mptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 7, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorne

To be Argued By: JAY P. LEFKOWITZ New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 .e

pellant did not have a meaningful opportunity to present evidence on his own behalf because 1 As set forth in greater detail in Section II, infra, the District Attorney's Office was presented with, and had already considered, much of this countervailing evidence as part of its pre-hearing investigation and discussion

re for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In

omptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorn

osition of the Assistant District Attorney charged with representing the State and instead, 1 As set forth in greater detail in Section II, infra, the District Attorney's Office was already presented with, and had already considered, much of this countervailing evidence as part of its pre-hearing investigation and di

February 9, 2011 To: Clerk, New York County Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. NEW YORK DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE One Hogan Place New York, NY Telephone: Lefkowitz, P.C. dra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Ne Telephone: Facsimile: Y. Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey E.

wo on the calendar, matter of Jeffrey Epstein. Your appearances please. MS. GAFFNEY: for the People. Good afternoon, Your Honor. MR. LEFKOWITZ: Jay Lefkowitz and Sandra Musumeci for Mr. Epstein. THE COURT: Mr. Epstein is not here. MR. LEFKOWITZ: That's correct. THE COURT: Are you waiving his appearance

ocedure 6(e) also does not impact the planned disclosures. The victim list itself is not grand jury material, and, thus, disclosure of that list to the District Attorney's Office will not violate Rule 6(e). If you wish to supply any additional authority (other than citation to Rule 6(e) and to paragraph 13 of the Agre

omptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorn

are for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In

hts to which he is entitled and which deprivation of those rights their actions occasioned. 2 As set forth in greater detail in Section II, infra, the District Attorney's Office was already presented with, and had already considered, much of this countervailing evidence as part of its pre-hearing investigation and di

As set forth in caption. There has been no change in the parties. 3. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT OR PETITIONER: Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Ne 4611 Telephone: Facsimile: 4. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE N

OW PENDING IN ANY COURT OF THIS OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. 10. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL APPEAL PENDING IN THIS ACTION. Dated: February 9, 2011 Ja . Lefkowitz, P.C. S dra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, 111.1611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant

ocedure 6(e) also does not impact the planned disclosures. The victim list itself is not grand jury material, and, thus, disclosure of that list to the District Attorney's Office will not violate Rule 6(e). If you wish to supply any additional authority (other than citation to Rule 6(e) and to paragraph 13 of the Agre

d: February 9, 2011 To: Clerk, New York County Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. NEW YORK DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE One Hogan Place New York, NY Telephone: Lefkowitz, P.C. a Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Ne Telephone: Faccim; Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey E. E P'ILED

ocedure 6(e) also does not impact the planned disclosures. The victim list itself is not grand jury material, and, thus, disclosure of that list to the District Attorney's Office will not violate Rule 6(e). If you wish to supply any additional authority (other than citation to Rule 6(e) and to paragraph 13 of the Agre