Epstein Secrets

tein reserves the right to intervene at that time." DE #56 at 5 (emphasis added). The defense attorneys' motion to intervene was filed by attorney Roy Black, Esq. On May 2, 2011, the victims' replied to the Government's objections, stipulating to redaction of addresses and contending that the correspond

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

tein reserves the right to intervene at that time." DE #56 at 5 (emphasis added). The defense attorneys' motion to intervene was filed by attorney Roy Black, Esq. On May 2, 2011, the victims' replied to the Government's objections, stipulating to redaction of addresses and contending that the correspond

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

igation, and this information is confidential pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). In an abundance of caution, defense team members Roy Black and Martin Weinberg, two of the attorneys who represented Jeffrey Epstein during the investigation, are filing this pleading to provide notice to t

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p