Epstein Secrets

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, ROY BLACK, et al., Intervenors. INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Intervenors Roy Black, Martin

CLUSION For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court should GRANT this motion and enter the requested Protective Order. Respectfully submitted, /s/Rov Black Roy Black Jackie Perczek BLACK, SREBNICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF P A. -12- EFTA00605762 Attorneys for Intervenors Is/Martin G. Weinberg Martin G.

out its contents." Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Case No. 3:13-cv-222-J-34JBT (M.D. Fla. March 13, 2014), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41406, at *6, quoting Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 31 (1984) Placing limitations on the dissemination and use of pretrial discovery is particularly important since "[t]he

NICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone (305) 371-6421 Fax (305)358-2006 By: s/Roy Black ROY BLACK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 126088 [email protected] JACKIE PERCZEK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0042201 [email protected] On behalf of Jef

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may re

ed on FLSD Docket 01/26/2015 Page 17 of 18 Respectfully submitted, BLACK SREBNICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard By: s/Roy Black ROY BLACK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 126088 [email protected] JACKIE PERCZEK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0042201 [email protected] On behalf of Jef

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may rest