Epstein Secrets

pstein 'a intention to comply with the terms or the Non-Prosecution Agreement by November 8, 2007. By: cc: It. Alexander ttomey Sincerely, It, Alexander ACO5Ut a stant United States Attorney EFTA00289783 "Ina 05/16/2008 11:18 FAX • 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAx UNITED STATES DEPARTME Criminal Divisio Chi

k Angus. NW Suite 600 Warldift0m. DC20130 P02)514-5780 FAX: (207)1/4.1793 May 15, 2008 Pursuant to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Eps

ey's Office lies with the U.S. Attorney. Therefore, to borrow a phrase from the case law, the question we sought to answer was whether U.S. Anorncy Acosta would abuse his discretion if he authorized prosecution in this case. As you know, our review of this case is limited, both fketually and legally.

that you now voice. Mr. Black and I did not have a chance to discuss the issue, but I had already conceived of a way to resolve that EFTA00289792 JAY P. LEFICOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 4 OF 5 issue if it were raised during negotiations. AS I stated, it was not, leading me to believe that it was not a

Quiz 013/013 et 00U Honorable Mark Filip May 19. 2008 Page 8 prosecution is fair and appropriate has been placed, once again, in U.S. Attorney Acosta's hands. in light of the foregoing, we respectfully ask that you review this matter and discontinue all federal involvement so that the State cam

rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter tit the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded many important aspects of this ease. Just this past Friday, on May 16, 2008, we received a t

SUFI, offered, in my opinion, numerous and various reasonable modifications and accommodations which ultimately resulted in United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta's' December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. In that letter, the United States Attorney tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the

ey cc: R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney A. Villafana Assistant U.S. Attorney Karen Atkinson Assistant U.S. Attorney EFTA00225701 JAY P. LEFICOWITZ, ESQ. May 19, 2008 PAGE 5 OF 6 C. "Mr. Epstein Does Not Believe lie Is Guilty Of The Federal Charges Enumerated Under Section 2255." At our Dec

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: ssistant United States Attorne 500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Telephone: Facsimile:

you and your client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Offi

y" hid from you the fact that Bert Ocariz is a friend of my boyfriend and that I have a "longstanding relationship" with Mr. Ocariz. EFTA00185239 JAY P. LEFICOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 2 OF 5 I informed you that I selected Mr. Ocariz because he was a friend and classmate of two people whom I respecte