Epstein Secrets

ur earliest convenience. Sincerely, cc. Alex A. Acosta Judge Kenneth Star Lilly Ann Sanchez Dal Vt.91

ing any victim notification letters until we can further discuss the contents therein. Please call me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, cc. Alex A. Acosta Judge Kenneth Star Lilly Ann Sanchez Dal Vt.911O9LBITIM34oroatAll(32nO-13:51) FOWLAR Win &SWETT PA. EFTA00214703 Doc -B7 -07 04:55m Froe-fow

gation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 23, 2007; R. Alexander Acosta's letter to Judge Edward B. Davis dated October 25, 2007; Jay l,cfkowitz's letter to dated November 8, 2007; Judge Kenneth Starr's letter to Alice F

(11° Cir. 2003); United States v. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 Ws Cir. 1999). United States v. Burgess, 175 F.3d 1261 (11° Cir. 1999). United States v. Roias, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (111° Cir. 2005); United States v. Root 296 F. 3d 1222 (11 ° Cir. 2002). What all of these cases have in common is that the defe

• 12/If/2001 If: IV FAX le I / IIU KIRKLAND A. ELLIS LLP I lononthle R. Alexander Acosta December 17. 2007 Page 10 testimony establishes: that the conduct was consensual: that she lied to Mr. Epstein about her age: that she instructed

off on sending any victim notification letters until we can further discuss the contents therein. Please call inc at your earliest convenience. cc. Alex A. Acosta Judge Kenneth Star Sincerely, Lilly Anu Sanchez FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. EFTA01718520 Doe-07-07 04:55en F ran-Fowl er-Whi te Burnett T-263

you and your client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Offi

338 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2003); United States v. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 Cir. 1999); United States 175 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 1999); United States v. Roias, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Root; 296 F. 3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). What all of these cases have in common is that the def

U HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT: (213) 680-8400. To: Company: United States Attorney's Office Hon. R. Alexander Acosta Southern District of Florida Fax 0: (305) 530-6444 Wrest (305) 961-9100 From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Pages *town December 7, 2007 34 (21

nited States Attorney's Office Hon. R. Alexander Acosta Southern District of Florida Fax 0: (305) 530-

1299 (11* Cir. 2003); United States'. Garrett 190 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); United States Burgess, 175 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 1999); United States Roias, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005); United States'. Root 296 F. 3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). What all of these cases have in common is that the defen