Epstein Secrets

ity, we will not produce the relevant documents. One such communication, however, was made in a December 6, 2007 letter from United States Attorney Acosta to myselE in which he stated that "the Office has no intention to take any position in any civil litigation arising between Mr. Epstein and any indi

change the fact that everything we've done is necessary in order to determine if we should settle: As a matter of fact, you and I discussed hiring Sandy Marks, a jury consultant Again, such an exercise would be extremely helpful at trial, but an analysis of what would happen at trial is exceptionally benef

ity, we will not produce the relevant documents. One such communication, however, was made in a December 6, 2007 letter from United States Attorney Acosta to myself, in which he stated that "the Office has no intention to take any position in any civil litigation arising between Mr. Epstein and any ind

change the fact that everything we've done is necessary in order to determine if we should settle: As a matter of fact, you and I discussed hiring Sandy Marks, a jury consultant. Again, such an exercise would be extremely helpful at trial, but an analysis of what would happen at trial is exceptionally bene

ity, we will not produce the relevant documents. One such communication, however, was made in a December 6, 2007 letter from United Stales Attorney Acosta to myself. in which he stated that "the Office has no intention to take any position in any civil litigation arising between Mr. Epstein and any ind

change the fact that everything we've done is necessary in order to determine if we should settle: As a matter of fact, you and I discussed hiring Sandy Marks, a jury consultant. Again, such an exercise would be extremely helpful at trial, but an analysis of what would happen at trial is exceptionally bene