Epstein Secrets

, you will be notified. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: cc: Special Agent

vents. At this time, your case is under investigation) If anyone is charged in connection with the investigation, you will be notified. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: cc: Special Agent Nesbitt ICuydrendall, A. Marie Villafana Assistant United States Attorney 08-80736-CV-MARRA 0007

Fifth Circuit's decision is that the Circuit did not directly quote three words found in the CVRA'a right to confer — the words "in the case." See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2. But the Fifth Circuit had received briefs totaling close to 100 pages in that case and was obviously well aware of the statute at hand. Inde

vents. At this time, your case is wider investigation) If anyone is charged in connection with the investigation, you will be notified. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta By: cc: Special Agent F.B.I. Assistant United States Attorney I • SI EFTA00229967 - Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-4 Entered on FLSD

, you will be notified. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta By: cc: Special Agent F.B.I. Assistant Unite

ttempt to distinguish Dean, it asks this Court to decline to follow the Fifth Circuit's holding antiseSELsatsfstkritv o.n_this important issue. See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2-3. Instead, the Government would have this Court deviate from the Fifth Circuit's well-reasoned opinion because the Circuit's "discussion of

mation would be disclosed to the victims about the agreement: Thank you, Jay. I have forwarded your message only to [United States Attorney] Alex [Acosta], =, and I don't anticipate it going any further than that. When I receive the originals, I will sign and return one copy to you. The other will

distinguish Dean, it asks this Court to decline to follow the Fifth Circuit's holding and create a split of authority on this important issue. See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2-3. Instead, the Government would have this Court deviate from the Fifth Circuit's well-reasoned opinion because the Circuit's "discussion of