Epstein Secrets

that during the time period addressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00725563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Departm

e Agreement. This provision led to settlements with persons who I Additionally, in an authoritative communication by the United States Attorney, R. Alexander Acosta, to Epstein's counsel dated December 4, 2007, the Government agreed that it was the intentions of the parties that the waiver of right to contest su

se fees (or the equivalent of over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and had little or no specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration o

is that during the time period addressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and approval of the United States Attorney Alexander Acosta, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington III., see letter appende

approval of the United States Attorney Alexander Acosta, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement

e fees (or the equivalent of over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who has no specialized expertise in areas relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. These charges are not neces

that during the time period addressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00614563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Departm

e Agreement. This provision led to settlements with persons who I Additionally, in an authoritative communication by the United States Attorney, R. Alexander Acosta, to Epstein's counsel dated December 4, 2007, the Government agreed that it was the intentions of the parties that the waiver of right to contest su

se fees (or the equivalent of over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and had little or no specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration o

that during the time period addressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00729129 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Departm

se fees (or the equivalent of over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and had little or no specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration o

that during the time period addressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00729137 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Departm

se fees (or the equivalent of over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and had little or no specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration o