Epstein Secrets

ern District of Florida From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Rpm vet os: December 7, 2007 34 Message Fax

680-8400. To: lion. R. Alexander Acosta Company: Fax N: Direct N: United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Rpm vet os: December 7, 2007 34 Message Fax N: Direct SI: EFTA00214706 12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 213 680 6500 KIRKLAND&F.I.LIS III' 00 2

(11° Cir. 2003); United States v. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 Ws Cir. 1999). United States v. Burgess, 175 F.3d 1261 (11° Cir. 1999). United States v. Roias, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (111° Cir. 2005); United States v. Root 296 F. 3d 1222 (11 ° Cir. 2002). What all of these cases have in common is that the defe

United States Attorney's Office Hon. R. Alexander Acosta Southern District of Florida Fax 0: (305) 530-6444 Wrest (305) 961-9100 From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Pages *town December 7, 2007 34 (213) 680-8500 (213) 680-8440 Fax 0: Direct II: Message: EFTA00176206 12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 213 680 85

Wrest (305) 961-9100 From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Pages *town December 7, 2007 34 (213) 680-85

1299 (11* Cir. 2003); United States'. Garrett 190 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); United States Burgess, 175 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 1999); United States Roias, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005); United States'. Root 296 F. 3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). What all of these cases have in common is that the defen

ut federal precedent — that such a process is consistent with the highest and. most noble goals of the criminal justice system: to team the truth. Kenneth W. Starr cc: First Assistant U.S. Attorney II If you ()nice wishes, it new submit this letter to the Stole Attorney's orrice, but the Slalc Attorney':: Off

delivery of any such letter, however, it should only be made by a third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of th

338 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2003); United States v. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 Cir. 1999); United States 175 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 1999); United States v. Roias, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Root; 296 F. 3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). What all of these cases have in common is that the def