Epstein Secrets

TIVE OFFICE US. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern Dtsolcr of Florida R. ALMANDER ACOSTA WItTn)STArat177OAlkele 9.21anSDELE Kenneth W. Starr, Beg Kirkland & Ellis LLP TV South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90011 Re: leffrev Epstein Dear Mr. Starr. St N.C4 Avner Mewl FL 33131 005

177OAlkele 9.21anSDELE Kenneth W. Starr, Beg Kirkland & Ellis LLP TV South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90011 Re: leffrev Epstein Dear Mr. Starr. St N.C4 Avner Mewl FL 33131 005)061.9100 . Mayhew MAP B04a4 • nodal& 1 write hirevonseloyourNoveunbes le letter, in which you raise concerns re

ty to review and raise objections to the terms of the Agreement Again, no one raised objections to the Section 2255 language. Since the signing of theAgreement, the defense team and our Office have addressed several Issues that have arisen under the Agreement. Although the exchanges were at times a bit liti

ICE US. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern Diener of Magda R. ALMANDER ACOSTA WItTn)STArat177OAlkele oariEty SYPFS);SIMILFy Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis UP Re. ,kffrev Epstein Dear Mr. Suer. St N.C4 Avner Mewl FL 33131 005)061.9100 . Mayhew MAP B04a4 • nodal& I write inr

rat177OAlkele oariEty SYPFS);SIMILFy Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis UP Re. ,kffrev Epstein

ity to review and rain objections to the terms of the Agreement Again, no one raised objections to the Section 2255 language. Since the signing of theAgreement, the defense team and our Office have addressed several Issues that have arisen under the Agreement. Although the exchanges were at times a bit liti

epartment of Justice Untied States Attorney Southern District of F7nrida AUXANDERACOOTA 0111W) SMITS 47-1(Mo2Y olitway BY P&(SIM11.9 Kenneth W, Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Starr ft Mt Area Mont Ft, 33132 0(2)9

ter all, Mr. Epstein is also represented by Dean Kenneth Starr, Martin Weinberg, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Ha

s, defense counsel suggested several similar arrangements, including a Trust !bad. Again, our decision not to ante a fund flows from our belief that theAgreement sbouldprovicie the same Taken) the victims as they would have been entitled had we proceeded to trial. A restitution land or trust fund would place