Epstein Secrets

behalf of such person) during the very• communication that constitutes the required basis for federal jurisdiction. EFTA00079412 LAW OF/PICCO OP GERALD B. LEFCOURT. P.C. FCre₹ o Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 25, 2007 Page 5 To our knowledge, the c

T TB" STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH riBlialloROWEWN:orn RENATO C.

ding of this statutory language would raise constitutional problems of fair warning, vagueness and lenity. EFTA00079411 LAW o•ICCS or GERALD 13. LEVCOURT. PC Chiefo the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 25, 2007 Page 4 We are, of course, mindf

Unpublished Internet Internet chat room; evidence clear defendant believed he was communicating with "minor"; attempted to entice her to fly to Hawaii to have sex; defendant claimed entrapment. Affirmed. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Sting U.S. v. Nicely, 172 Fed. Appx. 713 (9th Cir. 2006)

LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. • PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION I AS EAST 7S"

Unpublished Internet Internet chat room; evidence clear defendant believed he was communicating with "minor"; attempted to entice her to fly to Hawaii to have sex; defendant claimed entrapment. Affirmed. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Sling U.S. I Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9° Cir. 2006) Int

ld" neighbor; arrested in hotel where supposed to meet. • Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting Conviction affirmed. 87 EFTA01729571 I LEFCOURT'S LIST EFTA01729572

Unpublished Internet Internet chat room; evidence clear defendant believed he was communicating with "minor"; attempted to entice her to fly to Hawaii to have sex; defendant claimed entrapment. Affirmed. 2422(6); 2423(b) Not Consummated s tin U.S. v. Nisely, 172 Fed. Appx. 713 (9th Cir. 2006)