3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Karen — What do you think? Hi Jeff and Mau — I just want to again voice my disagreement with promising to have a meeting or having a meeting with Lefcourt or any other of Epstein's attorneys. As I mentioned, this is not a case where we will be sitting down to negotiate whether a defendant will serve on
ady raised in his letter (which is part of the indictment package) and during his meeting with Andy and myself. Those reasons are: (1) he wants the Petit policy to trump our ability to prosecute Epstein, (2) this shouldn't be a federal offense, and (3) the victims were willing participants so the crim
Karen — What do you think? Hi Jeff and Matt — I just want to again voice my disagreement with promising to have a meeting or having a meeting with Lefcourt or any other of Epstein's attorneys. As I mentioned, this is not a case where we will be sitting down to negotiate whether a defendant will serve on
already raised in his letter (which is part of the indictment package) and during his meeting with and myself. Those reasons are: (1) he wants the Petit policy to trump our ability to prosecute Epstein, (2) this shouldn't be a federal offense, and (3) the victims were willing participants so the crim
han as a white collar or public corruption case where the parties can amicably work out a light sentence. With respect to the "policy reasons" that Lefcourt wants to discuss, those were already raised in his letter (which is part of the indictment package) and during his meeting with Andy and myself. Tho
ady raised in his letter (which is part of the indictment package) and during his meeting with Andy and myself. Those reasons are: (I) he wants the Petit policy to trump our ability to prosecute Epstein, (2) this shouldn't be a federal offense, and (3) the victims were willing participants so the crim
Entities connected to both Gerald Lefcourt and Petit