Epstein Secrets

behalf of such person) during the very• communication that constitutes the required basis for federal jurisdiction. EFTA00079412 LAW OF/PICCO OP GERALD B. LEFCOURT. P.C. FCre₹ o Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 25, 2007 Page 5 To our knowledge, the c

T TB" STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH riBlialloROWEWN:orn RENATO C.

ding of this statutory language would raise constitutional problems of fair warning, vagueness and lenity. EFTA00079411 LAW o•ICCS or GERALD 13. LEVCOURT. PC Chiefo the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 25, 2007 Page 4 We are, of course, mindf

ission on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information W.D. Mo. U.S. v. Hicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage in sex act. Defendant claimed no violation o

LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. • PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION I AS EAST 7S"

Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage t in sex ac. 2422(b); 2423(b) Sting 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Not Consummated Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is gra

ld" neighbor; arrested in hotel where supposed to meet. • Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting Conviction affirmed. 87 EFTA01729571 I LEFCOURT'S LIST EFTA01729572

ssion on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(6) No Information W.D. Mo. U.S. v. Flicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage in sex act. Defendant claimed no violation o