Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00076068

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

d agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: Dated: Dated: By: A. MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCM3Z, BSQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 EFTA00076091 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

EFTA00095871

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

EFTA00191587_sub_001 - EFTA00191587_100

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons,

rge number of uncharged overt acts, those uncharged acts can serve as a variance from/amendment to the Indictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons, I have kept most of the overt acts from the original indictment (excluding those related to the Ja

he mmunity. See, e.g., Smith, 79 F.3d at 1210-1211 citing United StatesDillon, 938 F.2d 1412 (1st Cir. 1991); Suppa, 799 F.2d at 119; United taus, Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 706 n.7 (7th Cir. 1986); Hurtado, 779 F.2d at 147i-79; United States `Contreras, 776 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1985). nited Stata Hazime, 762