Epstein Secrets

re correct a t" containing 8/5/08 email from A. to A. Acosta, a re "Jeffrey Epstein Agreement" discussing 6/24/08 email from to R. Black and J. Goldberger concerning the binding nature of the Agreement Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Deliberative Process Suppl. Box #3 P-013290 Thru P-0132

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

t thru and regarding analysis of JeffiSstem agreement, with Deliberative Process P-015135 attached 6/24/2008 email from . I II to R. Black and J. Goldberger and attached Epstein agreement. (NB: Privilege is not being asserted for the two attachments. The 6/24/2008 email will be produced to petitioners'

cludes the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above."41 29. On September 17, 2007, the line prosecutor w

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

cludes the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above."41 29. On September 17, 2007, the line prosecutor w

T, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 6 of 6

ted: By: A. MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY Dated: JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 6 of 6 EFTA00193022 Page 1 of 3 IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT (s

minal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova, any employee of N.E.S. or any unnamed co-conspirators for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above. Further, although t

By: Dated: Dated: A. MARIE VILLAPARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSTEIN . • GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: - JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Jist 6 cr3 6 EFTA00193983 agreement, all outstanding grand jury subpoenas shall be deemed withdrawn.. By sig

ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: - JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Jist 6 cr3 6

al charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above; Further, no immigration "proceeding will be institu

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

cludes the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against Lesley Groff, and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above."41 29. On September 17, 2007, the line prosecutor w

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

lso precludes the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against M , and or any employee of N.E.S. for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation as described above."41 29. On September 17, 2007, the line prosecutor w