Epstein Secrets

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

torney Guy Lewis' review. Id. at 36,1 110 (citing Exs. 103 & 104). On June 30, 2008, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent an email to Epstein's attorney Jack Goldberger: "Jack: The FBI has received several calls regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement. I do not know whether the title of the document was disclosed wh

or the victims. 11 EFTA00597328 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 417 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 12 of 33 initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges.

equires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (E. Fla. 2012). If the evidence offered by the nonmoving party is 17 EFTA00597334 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 41

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts " 3 See Exhibit 88. IM Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18