Epstein Secrets

[email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Au

useattorney.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Au

of the claim." As stated by the Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-323, 106 S.Ct. 254

llowing service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this t5 day of March, 2010: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Leh

M/ECF on this t5 day of March, 2010: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counse

ief is sought may move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim." As stated by the Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322- 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 (1986) ... summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interroga

JA ET AL. SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 25 EFTA00799363 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldber er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward B

h, FL 33409 Jack Goldber er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 14

e of proof of any essential element of a party's cause of action necessarily renders all other facts offered by the non-moving party immaterial. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). "Just because conflicting evidence exists does not mean probable cause is a jury question." C.A. Hansen Corp

robable cause. TONJA ET AL. SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldber er, Es . Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 29 EFTA00583980 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq.

each, FL 33409 Jack Goldber er, Es . Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 29 EFTA00583980 250 Australian A

e of proof of any essential element of a party's cause of action necessarily renders all other facts offered by the non-moving party immaterial. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). "Just because conflicting evidence exists does not mean probable cause is a jury question." C.A. Hansen Corp