Epstein Secrets

D Docket 04/23/2009 Page 8 of 9 - 9 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein C

mits the Affidavit of his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, who asserts that “the USAO has taken the positi

lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings.” Id. at *1. Moreover, the stay in Ventura was granted on motion of the defendant Miami-Dade County Police Department because it would be prejudiced by its codefendant, a former police officer, asserting the Fifth Amendment and refusing to answer “in response to th

D Docket 04/23/2009 Page 8 of 9 - 9 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein C

mits the Affidavit of his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, who asserts that “the USAO has taken the positi

lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings.” Id. at *1. Moreover, the stay in Ventura was granted on motion of the defendant Miami-Dade County Police Department because it would be prejudiced by its codefendant, a former police officer, asserting the Fifth Amendment and refusing to answer “in response to th

mits the Affidavit of his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, who asserts that "the USAO has taken the positi

SERVICE LIST Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Attorneys for Defendant ritton, Jr. chael James e er & Coleman 33401-2918 Lead Counsel Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. West Palm Beach FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley JaMes Edwards ler Ft. Lauderdale, F

to lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings." Id. at *I. Moreover, the stay in Ventura was granted on motion of the defendant Miami-Dade County Police Department because it would be prejudiced by its codefendant, a former police officer, asserting the Fifth Amendment and refusing to answer "in response to th

2 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2009 Page 9 of 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger. Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein - 9 - EFTA00222594

mits the Affidavit of his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, who asserts that "the USAO has taken the positi

to lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings." Id. at *1. Moreover, the stay in Ventura was granted on motion of the defendant Miami-Dade County Police Department because it would be prejudiced by its codefendant, a former police officer, asserting the Fifth Amendment and refusing to answer "in response to th

so those questions are still objected to, unresolved. So, we'll stoppage We will go from there, see what happens. Id. at page 98; lines 13-18. MR. GOLDBERGER: Well, wait a minute. Just one thing... So if we had asked the same questions, he would have raised the same objections, so not only are we going t

re I am not going to answer that question. Id. at 18-19. Q: If Mr. Fisten represented that he was associated with the Miami-Dade Police Department, Miami-Dade County Police Department, would you find that conduct inappropriate. Id. at 21-24. MR. SCAROLA: Same instruction and I would also observe with regard to each of the hypoth

so those questions are still objected to, unresolved. So, we'll stoppage We will go from there, see what happens. Id. at page 98; lines 13-18. MR. GOLDBERGER: Well, wait a minute. Just one thing... So if we had asked the same questions, he would have raised the same objections, so not only are we going t

re I am not going to answer that question. Id. at 18-19. Q: If Mr. Fisten represented that he was associated with the Miami-Dade Police Department, Miami-Dade County Police Department, would you find that conduct inappropriate. Id. at 21-24. MR. SCAROLA: Same instruction and I would also observe with regard to each of the hypoth