Epstein Secrets

RE BURMAN, CIUTTON.LAD1TER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Ewan Boulevard Suite 400 North Pahn Beech, Florida 33401 On Wu for the Defendant. Jeffrey Eptlein- JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE ATTERBURY. GOIDEERGER & WEISS'S t1 250 Auendon Mesa Sou& Suite 1400 Were Palm Bach, Florida 334014012 On behalf of Plantar in Related

Wu for the Defendant. Jeffrey Eptlein- JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE ATTERBURY. GOIDEERGER & WEISS'S t1 25

es. 16 Q. Does your — and did your grandmother work 17 during that time period? 18 A. Yes. 19 What kind of work did she do? 20 She works at Home Depot 21 Does she still work there? 22 Yes. 23 And does she own the house on Edge Hill Road? 24 Yes. 25 Okay. And when you lived on — and she had

with PBSO, for the Sex Offender Registration, he did not give them his updated company information. The location is the same." Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, did not return calls for comment. — mdargan @pbdailynews.com 1 Jan. 6, 2010 — Palm Beach to New York. Leaves New York at 2:15 a.m. on \ Jan. 7 fo

location is the same." Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, did not return calls for comment. — mdargan @p

n his private jet multiple times each month to the Virgin Islands or New York, all in compliance with a court order. He has spent blocks of time in Home Depot and Sports Authority multiple times, as documented in his daily probation logs. On March 31, he was at Home Depot from 6 to 10 p.m., according to h

ez, Fowler White Burnett, Miami, FL; (5) Jack A. Goldberger, Goldberger & Weiss, West Palm Beach, FL; and (6)

Miami, FL; (3) Gerald B. Lefcourt, Law Office of Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C., New York, NY (4) Lilly Ann Sanchez, Fowler White Burnett, Miami, FL; (5) Jack A. Goldberger, Goldberger & Weiss, West Palm Beach, FL; and (6) Joe D. Whitley, Alston & Bird, Washington D.C.; as well as Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.

atutory construction that the words of a statute must be read in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme." I Home Depot U.S.A.. Inc. v. Jackson 587 U.S. —, —, 139 S. Ct. 1743, 1748, 204 L.Ed.2d 34 (2019) (quoting 11 Davis v. Mich. Dep't of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803, 80