Epstein Secrets

ourt, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton

Docket 05/06/2009 Page 8 of 9 - - 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Adam D. Horowitz Case

ot only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also “inform the discovery process.” Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The Committee Notes state, in relevant part, as follows: Courts should presumptively issue protective orders barring discovery unless the

ourt, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton

red on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 9 of 10 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Adam D. Horowitz 10 C

ot only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also “inform the discovery process.” Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The 3 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 3 of 10 Committee Notes state, in relevant part, a

District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critt

ourt, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critt

a v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996) (granting protective order pursuant to Rul

ir. 1976) (finding psychotherapist-patient communications fall within right to privacy); Haw. Psychiatric Soc'y v. Arivoshi, 48] F. Supp. 1028, 1038 (D. Haw. 1979) (finding zone of autonomy protects decision to communicate personal information to psychiatrist); see also Nat'l Transp. Safety Bd. v. Hollywoo

a notes 483-493 and accompanying text. *65 Peter Goldberger, Statement on Behalf of the Nat'l Assoc. of Crim.