Epstein Secrets

of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.,Leopold- Kuvin, P.A., Counsel for Plaintiff; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, Co-Counstaerfor Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, on this / Sia of April, 2009 & COLEMAN, LLP By: Robert D. Cr F

ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA.. and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger EFTA00614418 IN TH

TON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates, LLC HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, and JACK A GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger EFTA00614419 g e sz LEOPOLD—KUVIN, CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS April 10, 2009 Fax and Mail Robert Critton, Esq. Mi

nt Beach, and Robert M. Moletterre, o Graham, Moletteire, 'futile & Torpy, PA., Melbourne, for Respondents. HARRIS, J. Gary and Joellen Parrish ("Parrish") sued State Farm as their uninsured motorist carrier. Since there were two policies involved, Parrish claimed that the policy coverage for each p

process concerning the stacking cover- age option was handled by State Fenn, apparently to see if there was any basis to avoid the con- sequence of Parrish's previous selection. When the trial court ordered the production, State Farm filed its certiorari petition urging that the discovery re- quest was

e copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 13th day of April ., 2009: Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff Fax: Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein N &

OWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, erbury Goldberger & Weiss, PA., EFTA00722688 IN THE COURT OF THE

m Beach, and Robert M. Moletteire, of Graham, Moletteire, 'futile & Torpy, PA., Melbourne, for Respondents. HARRIS, J. Gary and Joellen Parrish ("Parrish") sued State Farm as their uninsured motorist carrier. Since there were two policies involved, Parrish claimed that the policy coverage for each p

process concerning the stacking cover- age option was handled by State Fann, apparently to see if there was any basis to avoid the con- sequence of Parrish's previous selection. When the trial court ordered the production, State Farm filed its certiorari petition urging that the discovery re- quest was

kenbach, Esq. Rachel J. Glasser, Esq. LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Ste. 301 h, Florida 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. KITERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Ste. 1400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein 30 Marc

ida 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. KITERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250

States, 4 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) Labor Ready Se. Inc. v. Australian Warehouses Condo. ffi, 14, 16, 17 962 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) Parrish v. Dougherty, 14 505 So.2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) Pleus v. Crist, 22 14 So.3d 941 (Fla.2009) Poole v. City of Port Orange, 1 33 So.3d 739 (F

er LLC o- ounse or ee nt ounter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik . Nurik yard, Suite 700 01 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbur , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. Suite 1400 01 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein VIA U.S. MAIL ONLY The Honorable

1 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbur , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. Suite 1400

party may waive its objection to an order setting trial, "notwithstanding the compulsory nature of rule 1.440." 170 So. 3d at 130. "For example, in Parrish v. Dougherty, 505 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), the appellant's attorney appeared at the trial and participated without objecting to the manner i

statement was made with “actual malice—that is knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” I was Justice Goldberg’s law clerk when the Supreme Court rendered that precedent-shattering decision. Goldberg told me that he was concerned that the daunting requirements

ns, he didn’t feel they were right for the job. They worked together through scholarship and advocacy against the death penalty for the remainder of Goldberg’s life. It is difficult to imagine that Goldberg could have found a more willing and able confederate than Alan Dershowitz. 159 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017

attorney was a young Bible Belt fundamentalist named Larry Parrish. (The names of all the participants sounded like puns: Reems, Streicker, Lovelace, Parrish.) Parrish was dubbed by the press as “Mr. Clean,” “The Memphis Heat,” and “the Memphis Smut Raker.” A born-again Christian, and an elder in the First

00 01 ounse or e e nt Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Suite 1400

party may waive its objection to an order setting trial, "notwithstanding the compulsory nature of rule 1.440." 170 So. 3d at 130. "For example, in Parrish v. Dougherty, 505 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), the appellant's attorney appeared at the trial and participated without objecting to the manner i