Epstein Secrets

[email protected] 7 8 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, PA 9 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 10 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.659.8300 11 BY: JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE [email protected] 12 13 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street 14 Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 15 954.467.1223 BY: TONJA H

w.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 001264 EFTA00613561 55 1 shouldn't. I ruled in your favor and I've ruled 2 against you. I've ruled in Mr. Goldberger's 3 favor; I've ruled against him. I've ruled in 4 favor of Mr. Edwards' claims and contentions; I've 5 ruled against him. 6 But I'm just hav

m 888 811-3408 001278 EFTA00613575 69 62:11 forever (2) 16:12,14 forget (1) further (3) 14:19 36:7 38:10 future (1) 46:11 55:17 56:22 GOLDBERG... 2:8,10 hand (1) 36:12 handle (1) 24:24 holds (2) 25:12,16 Honor (27) 3:5 4:20,24 5:25 14:18 39:22 Goldberger's ... handled (3) 6:10,

MR. BREWER: So let's get into the Wolfe case. That's where we're headed next. And really there's a trilogy of cases. There's the Levin case, the Echevarria case, if I'm somewhere close to pronouncing that correctly, and the Wolfe case. All of them deal with litigation privilege which dates back to 191

•• "THE COURT: This deals with the litigation privilege?" The attorney then goes on to say, "Yes, sir, it does deal with litigation privilege. Echevarria also deals with the litigation privilege. Delmonico stands for the proposition that the issues with regard to privilege are some issues of law for

submits that the trial court's Order granting his Motion for Summary Judgment was proper, as the binding decisions by the Florida Supreme Court in Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007) and Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639

Suite 350 444 W. Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fred Haddad Fred Haddad, P.A. 1 Financial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jack Goldberger 24 EFTA00589644 Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik 1 E. Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S.

Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jack Goldberger 24 EFTA00589644 Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik

ed directly to the litigation. Under well-established Florida Supreme Court precedent, the litigation privilege applies to all causes of action. See Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007); Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell, M. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.

ct occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding . . . so long as the act has some relation to the proceeding." Levin, 639 So. 2d at 608. In Echevarria, the Court reiterated its broad application of privilege "applies in all causes of action, statutory as well as common law." Echevarria, 950 So. 2d

submits that the trial court's Order granting his Motion for Summary Judgment was proper, as the binding decisions by the Florida Supreme Court in Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007) and Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell, M. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 S

rting.com 888 811-3408 EFTA00606577 69 62:11 forever (2) 16:12,14 forget (1) further (3) 14:19 36:7 38:10 future (1) 46:11 55:17 56:22 GOLDBERG... 2:8,10 hand (1) 36:12 handle (1) 24:24 holds (2) 25:12,16 Honor (27) 3:5 4:20,24 5:25 14:18 39:22 Goldberger's ... handled (3) 6:10,1

[email protected] 7 8 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, PA 9 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 10 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.659.8300 11 BY: JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE [email protected] 12 13 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street 14 Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 15 954.467.1223 BY: TONJA H

and www.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 EFTA00606563 55 1 shouldn't. I ruled in your favor and I've ruled 2 against you. I've ruled in Mr. Goldberger's 3 favor; I've ruled against him. I've ruled in 4 favor of Mr. Edwards' claims and contentions; I've 5 ruled against him. 6 But I'm just hav

nger an issue either for purposes of 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 and now this Wolfe case is not being disposed of 23 24 25 Wolfe, Levin, and Echevarria cases. this summary judgment. Pursuant -- THE COURT: Let me stop you, Mr. King, so that you're not confused by my preliminary statements to Mr. B

A: So let's get into the Wolfe 9 case. That's where we're headed next. And really 10 there's a trilogy of cases. There's the Levin 11 case, the Echevarria case, if I'm somewhere close 12 to pronouncing that correctly, and the Wolfe case. 13 All of them deal with litigation privilege which 14 dates

each Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. 250 Australian Ave. South, Ste. 1400 West

lints:led to: 4 O. a RAFELE CIRC. is JUDGE nit tit.. EFTA00617982 Jack Scarola, Esq. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. 250 Australian Ave. South, Ste. 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 B

Beach, FL 33401 ittck x Scam] i sE u r e • Inca Searcy Denney Scuola et al 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Atterbury, Goldberger & 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esquire 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale FL 301 Bradley

HIAIT "B" EFTA00617998 The Court thoroughly reviewed Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell v. US. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007), and Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). These case

underlying proceeding. Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 SO. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994). This position was reaffirmed in Echevarria. In Wolfe, the Third District Court of Appeal, quoting in large part from Echevarria, found specifically that the litigation privilege applies to m

ancial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 S. Austra

l Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 S. Austra

ct occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding . . . so long as the act has some relation to the proceeding." Levin, 639 So. 2d at 608. In Echevarria, the Court reiterated its broad application of privilege "applies in all causes of action, statutory as well as common law." Echevarria, 950 So. 2d

ed directly to the litigation. Under well-established Florida Supreme Court precedent, the litigation privilege applies to all causes of action. See Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007); Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell,.. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2

submits that the trial court's Order granting his Motion for Summary Judgment was proper, as the binding decisions by the Florida Supreme Court in Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barren & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007) and Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell,.. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.

inancial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 01 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S. Aust

ial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 01 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S. Aust

to allow a party to `prosecut[e] or defend[] a lawsuit without fear of having to defend their actions in a subsequent civil action for misconduct.' Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So.2d 380, 384 (Fla. 2007); see also Levin, 639 So.2d at 608 C[A]bsolute immunity must be afforde

OURT: Mr. King, anything that's being alleged here that goes outside of the broad spectrum that I have read into the record that has its genesis in Echevarria and was quoted by the Wolfe Third District Court of Appeal opinion? MR. KING: There's nothing alleged. (T. 53-54). Accordingly, as explicitly stat

requests this Court to infer about Wright as a result of its citation in Levin, the Florida Supreme Court subsequently made it abundantly clear in Echevarria that "the nature of the underlying dispute simply does not matter," and mandated that the litigation privilege be broadly applied "across the board

Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Gok)erfit. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 14

LT "II" EFTA00805524 The Court thoroughly reviewed Levin, Midcllebrooks, Moves & Mitchell v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007), and Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). These case

underlying proceeding. Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 SO. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994). This position was reaffirmed in Echevarria. In Wolfe, the Third District Court of Appeal, quoting in large part from Echevarria, found specifically that the litigation privilege applies to m

, P.A. Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik Jack Goldberger Atterburv. Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. -19- EFTA00

. Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik Jack Goldberger Atterburv. Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. -19- EFTA00

ss and malicious prosecution claims, and also finding that Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007), and Wolfe provided "binding precedent in this area of law." (R. 1203).2 Fi

k Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterb , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. o- ounse or

o use their best judgment in prosecuting ... a lawsuit without fear of having to defend their actions in a subsequent civil action for misconduct." Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & &apple?. v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380, 384 (Fla. 2007). It is also crucial that these e-mails be available to the jury as the

)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire [email protected]; Tonja Haddad Col

topher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger et al. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nuri

nesses, and counsel as well. id. The litigation privilege applies in all causes of action, whether for common- law torts or statutory violations. See Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007). Defamatory statements made by lawyer while interviewing a witness in prepar