Epstein Secrets

ed one. Epstein's attorneys actually made these baseless allegations in depositions and other court filings. (See, e.g., Jane Doei Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, Court File No. 08-80804-Civ- Marra/Johnson, DEl at 44-52.) 42 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000861 EFTA00230685 fmney,'" Case 9:08-cv-8

gs. (See, e.g., Jane Doei Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, Court File No. 08-80804-Civ- M

ntifiable victims and afford the victims of the rights set forth in the CVRA, prior to the actual entry of the guilty plea. Id at 393. Ultimately, the Fifth Circuit found the district court erred in entering its ex pane order because the fewer than 200 victims "could be easily reached." Id. at 394-95. Additional

iderable discretion in ruling on a motion to set aside an entry of default, and the Court's decision will only be reviewed for abuse of discretion. Robinson, US, 734 F.2d 735, 739 (11111 Cir. 1984); Baez 1. S.S. Kresge Co., 518 F.2d 349, 350 (5th Cir. 1975).' "[D]efaults are seen with disfavor because o

onner" City of Pritchard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 & 1209 (11111 Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent the decisions of the Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981. 2 EFTA00221159 Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2008 Page 3 of 6 considere

iderable discretion in ruling on a motion to set aside an entry of default, and the Court's decision will only be reviewed for abuse of discretion. Robinson. US, 734 F.2d 735, 739 (11111 Cir. 1984); Baez. S.S. Kresge Co., 518 F.2d 349, 350 (5th Cir. 1975).' "[D]efaults are seen with disfavor because of

nner.. City of Pritchard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 & 1209 (11111 Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent the decisions of the Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981. 2 EFTA00222637 Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'162008 Page 3 of 6 considered

States v. St. Amour, 886 F.3d 1009, 1013 (11th Cir. 2018) (quoting United States v. Fisher, 289 F.3d 1329, 1337-38 (11th Cir. 2002)); see also ? Robinson g Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 341, 117 S.Ct. 843, 136 L.Ed.2d 808 (1997) ("The plainness or ambiguity of WESTLAW @ 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim

A. Id. The district court rejected the victims' request, and the victims filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, pursuant to § 377l (d)(3). ? I Id. Upon review, the Fifth Circuit concluded, as discussed above, that " '[t]here am clearly rights under the CVRA

he defend- ant] belonged to a gang or that gang membership would impeach [the defendant's testimony] about his 1- ligious beliefs"); United States Robinson, 978 F.2d 1554, 15 5 (10th Cir.1992) (rejecting a First Amendment challenge because "the government presented adequate ex- pert testimony as to th

e Constitution. Even in the case of In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), upon which the plaintiffs rely, the district court, after remand from the Fifth Circuit, denied the motion of the victims to invalidate the defendant's plea agreement as a remedy for the claimed violation of the Crime Victims' Rights A