Epstein Secrets

ed one. Epstein's attorneys actually made these baseless allegations in depositions and other court filings. (See, e.g., Jane Doe' Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, Court File No. 08-80804-Civ- Marra/Johnson, DEl at 44-52.) 42 EFTA00177092 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD

gs. (See, e.g., Jane Doe' Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, Court File No. 08-80804-Civ- M

ow them to intervene as parties to a prosecution." In re Amy Unknown, F.3d 2011 WL 988882 at *2 (5th Cir. Mar. 22, 2011). See also United Stases' Aguirre-Gonzalez, 597 F.3d 46, *Fed. R. Crim. P. 60 was adopted on April 23, 2008 and made effective on December 1, 2008. While this was after most of the relevant

ed one. Epstein's attorneys actually made these baseless allegations in depositions and other court filings. (See, e.g., Jane Doei Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, Court File No. 08-80804-Civ- Marra/Johnson, DEl at 44-52.) 42 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000861 EFTA00230685 fmney,'" Case 9:08-cv-8

gs. (See, e.g., Jane Doei Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, Court File No. 08-80804-Civ- M

w them to intervene as parties to a prosecution." In re Amy Unknown, F.3d , 2011 WL 988882 at •2 (5th Cr. Mar. 22, 2011). See also United States. Aguirre-Gonzalez, 597 F.3d 46, 'Fed. R. Crim. P. 60 was adopted on April 23, 2008 and made effective on December 1, 2008. While this was after most of the relevant

he defend- ant] belonged to a gang or that gang membership would impeach [the defendant's testimony] about his 1- ligious beliefs"); United States Robinson, 978 F.2d 1554, 15 5 (10th Cir.1992) (rejecting a First Amendment challenge because "the government presented adequate ex- pert testimony as to th

here petitioners sought to vacate plea agreement which made no provision for restitution in deference to pending civil litigation); United States'. Aguirre-Gonzalez, 597 F.3d 46 (1st Cir. 2010) (relying on the "strong interest in the finality of criminal sentences" to reject mandamus under the Act where a defend