Epstein Secrets

Mr. Goldberger, and had no idea that Mr. Goldberger's law partner was married to a sex-crimes prosecutor—much less that that fact would trigger Ms. Weiss's recusal. And Ms. Belohbvek—not Ms. Weiss—remained in charge of the State's prosecution of Mr. Epstein before, during, and after the retention of

much less for the purpose of engaging in "illicit sexual conduct." To the contrary, the prospect that Mr. Epstein might engage in sexual activity in Florid was not the dominant motive—or even a significant motive—for his travel. See Mortensen I United EFTA00225877 • Page 32 Federal prosecutors have

sentence does not change the fact that the sentence was available to the State and rejected in its discretion. Therefore, Petite's presumption that the State of Florida's prior prosecution of Mr. Epstein has vindicated the federal interest cannot be said to have been overcome. • • Second, the State's proposed plea

825 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 204 West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 561-433-2355 August 16, 2010 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss, P.A. 250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re.: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: Since my initial assessm

presiding over his or her case for further disposition pt thellbeterti0nOftht mesidinJandge. (e) If placed on Electronic Mothtormg you will pay to the Stare of Florida. for the cost of Electronic Monitoring 51.0O per day, per PS. 941.09; DeferCialti MAI( ci.; r<ci 4_7s c.-4- (!p Ways (c) t dam. 33 CONDITION

NAME: • Jeffrey Epstein do Burman, Critton, Luther, & Coleman LLP DATE AND TIME: September 2, 2009 10:00 AM LOCATION: Atterbury, Goldberger, Weiss 250 S. Austrailian Ave S Suite 1400 WPB, FL 33401 upon an oral examination before a Notary Public or officer authorized by law to take deposition

n Ave S Suite 1400 WPB, FL 33401 upon an oral examination before a Notary Public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida_ The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. The depositions are being taken for purposes of discovery, for use at trial or

ay 8:23 9:9 10:5,16 10:19 11:4 13:16 14:10 19:23 25:1 25:18 27:3,4 28:22 28:23 ways 30:18 wealthy 32:13 weigh 26:11 Weinberg 2:17 4:16 4:16 Weiss 2:12 wel17:10 8:20 10:22 11:12,12,13,13 12:17 13:16 14:11 15:7 16:18 17:15 17:23 18:10,11 33:24 35:12,19,20 36:5 39:4 40:13 went 6:18,22 26:2

ying 13:25 far 11:12 10:2,5,11 entered 13:17 four 10:15,20,24 7:3 6:12,16 7:3 Federal 13 20 11:3,14,17 desire entitled 6:10 7:9 14 Frida EFTA00233785 Proceedings 13:10 14:17 14:18 gives 8:9, 10 go 5:5 7:18,18 8:22 10:11 11:12,23,25 12:4 13:7 13:25 15:11 goes 5:24 going

03 Dear Ms. Hackett, As we discussed. J have agreed to cancel the deposition of ASA Daliah Weiss at this time. Based on the conversations with Ms. Weiss and you, I do not foresee the need at this time to reset this deposition, but I cannot completely foreclose the possibility of deposition in the fut

t :-, l and pe r before the S'rATE ATTORNEY h Assistant, in and fat' 1 rn r , ,r f . . j .1 t f , , -y 1. Highway, es !all!! Bach, Flolida 401, ,n Mond~y, I t ~bet 14, ZOO<I 1n:ou .:s , f-r the f U l p ·, .. E" 1 C, 1 t. 1 l<?C-1 .• ~ m I" 11 r n•J Jl!.-YFREY E l!":PS'I'

rand Jury testimony. Messages were left on their voicemail. On April 17, 2006, during the hours of 9:00 am and 11:30 am I again left messages for ASA Weiss and ASA Belohlavek for either of them to return my call as I had not heard from the State Attorney’s Office as to the time and date of the Grand Jury

y encourage the view that the office should have been tougher. Although the terms of confinement in a state prison are a matter appropriately left to the State of Flor- ida, and not federal authorities, without doubt, the treat- ment that he received while in state custody undermined the purpose of a jail sentence. Some